• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Joe Biden Threatens Americans with Nukes and F15’s over 2A

GM-GUY said:
So, how are they going to handle even 10 people per state that just start shooting?
Click to expand...
that is why they are cleaning up military right now keeping in only the loyal ones. no militia or group of individuals can effectively counteract regular forces.
it is not very difficult to do, it was just not yet done in this country yet, but, there is a first one for anything. legislation is in place, fbi on guard to suppress any attempt to form a communication between 'enemies of the people' -agents are in place and listening, all parts are coming together quite nicely, like by the textbook.
 
robjax said:
"The second amendment from the day it was passed limited the type of people who could own a gun and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn't buy a cannon."

This is all correct.

Let us explore.

"limited the type of people who could own a gun" - off course...this was based on race/ethnicity. Like we keep saying, "gun control is racist".

Thank you Joe Biden for pointing that out.

"and what type of weapon you could own. You couldn't buy a cannon." - Also correct Joe Biden. The restriction were that you could possess bearable arms like rifles, pistols, knives, swords....you know.....limited to weapons you could carry, thus "keep and bear arms".

Thank you Joe Biden for proving our point.
Click to expand...
But this is flat dead wrong, and he is wrong, individuals and private companies could own cannons back then, privateer naval ships lined with cannons were a thing, merchant ships also often had cannons for defending from pirates, and there was nothing wrong with owning those types of military arms which were the "f15's and nukes" of their day. Obviously private individuals back then couldn't usually afford to buy a cannon but if some wealthy person wanted one I'm sure they could have bought one or had one made with no issues. Also remember privately owned firearms back then were also mostly Kentucky rifles and black powder shotguns and the like which were often more accurate, higher quality, and more deadly than the muskets that the military used, that's why the revolutionaries were so effective at fighting off the British when using guerilla tactics.
 
Last edited:
moojpg2 said:
But this is flat dead wrong, and he is wrong, individuals and private companies could own cannons back then, privateer naval ships lined with cannons were a thing, merchant ships also often had cannons for defending from pirates, and there was nothing wrong with owning those types of military arms which were the "f15's and nukes" of their day. Obviously private individuals back then couldn't usually afford to buy a cannon but if some wealthy person wanted one I'm sure they could have bought one or had one made with no issues. Also remember privately owned firearms back then were also mostly Kentucky rifles and black powder shotguns and the like which were often more accurate, higher quality, and more deadly than the muskets that's the military used, that's why the revolutionaries were so effective at fighting off the British when using guerilla tactics.
Click to expand...
on top of this - we can still buy cannons today. we didn't earn this ability over time. they didn't decide "now that we have modern artillery, we can thrown the plebes a bone here."
 
paul73 said:
that is why they are cleaning up military right now keeping in only the loyal ones. no militia or group of individuals can effectively counteract regular forces.
it is not very difficult to do, it was just not yet done in this country yet, but, there is a first one for anything. legislation is in place, fbi on guard to suppress any attempt to form a communication between 'enemies of the people' -agents are in place and listening, all parts are coming together quite nicely, like by the textbook.
Click to expand...
Enemies of the people, or the people's party?
 
G Port said:
that's the thing to remember though. Rules of engagement would not apply to insurrection targets on American soil. The swamp will protect it's ass at all costs.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure any sitting Commander in Chief is going to want his legacy to be "the guy who slaughtered millions of Americans".....but then again Abe Lincoln was fine with that so who knows.

At the same time, even if a high percentage of military rank and file refuse orders to murder Americans (I'm honestly not convinced the % will be all that high), the gov't has a slew of private mercenary armies that would jump at the chance to kill us, like Constellis et al.

Problem with a civil war is the outcome is unknown. Not just in terms of do the patriots win, or do the commies win, but in terms of international involvement. Say a rebellion really brought the gov't to its knees, China and Russia would pounce. A US Civil war would probably result in WWIII. Even if the patriots win and international involvement is avoided, setting up a new country is going to be very difficult. Some people are simply going to refuse to accept any new governmental authority, so there will be a persistent ongoing insurgency(prob not the right word). I for one, am not consenting to be governed unless the new gov't is based on pure, unadulterated, no compromise libertarianism.
 
mothybee said:
Uncle Joe said "The rights of the people are given by the Government." That explains a lot. He just doesn't remember what country he's in.
Click to expand...
saying that after swearing on a bible "to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" should be an autoimpeach....Just saying that is a violation of the oath.
 
stealth2600 said:
Much like the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam, the military would not be able to identify their targets very easily. They would be mixed among the population and thus many civilian casualties would occur. Much like Hamas is doing to Israel in Palestine, these civilians would be used as human shields. The government would be forced to kill many of those they’d consider loyal with the use of nukes or F15’s. This is why I believe armed patriots have the upper hand, the cause and the zeal to win such a fight. It wouldn’t be long before the military defected, I can’t imagine any soldier enjoying or obeying the order to kill his fellow citizen, friend, brother, sister or family member over the leftist attempts to destroy 2A or for that matter the country.
Click to expand...

Imagine the US Army trying to fight in Afghanistan while having bases guarded by a wire fence and troops living in Afghan neighborhoods. That'd be what fighting the US citizens would be like. AR-15s and vastly superior numbers would do the job quickly.
 
Someone might want to explain to potato head and his cohorts what unfettered asymmetrical warfare is.
It's run us out of several countries so far.
 
GM-GUY said:
So, who is going to service, load, fuel and fly F-15's that heading for Texas? The first time the US military is turned against the citizenry in that fashion, a significant number of others are going to start selecting their own targets.
Click to expand...
Any one still in uniform carrying out those orders, will be shot.
 
GM-GUY said:
So, who is going to service, load, fuel and fly F-15's that heading for Texas? The first time the US military is turned against the citizenry in that fashion, a significant number of others are going to start selecting their own targets.

Nukes? really. He apparently has at least considered the possibility of using US nukes against the citizenry. When is his psych eval scheduled?
Click to expand...

This is why tyrants need their own police force. Can’t rely on career military to carry out your orders.
 
Varmint said:
This is why tyrants need their own police force. Can’t rely on career military to carry out your orders.
Click to expand...
Well, they can if it's
iu
 
Right Joe... you need F-15's and Nukes.

Oh that's right... Joe never met Mr. Nathaniel Victor

1624573225483.png

President Biden was not in military and did not serve in war.


He received five student draft deferments due to medical exceptions during his time as an undergraduate at the University of Delaware, and at Syracuse University, where he studied Law.
 

Similar threads

Report: Americans Own over 700 Million Ammo Mags with Greater Than 10-Round Capacity
Replies
23
Views
547
1sern
1
Over 3,000 sheriffs demand Biden BLOCK the sale of big gun ammunition and primer manufacturer to a foreign buyer with ties to Russia and China
Replies
3
Views
158
OnTheRoad
OnTheRoad
Teacher Threatens to ‘Shoot Up’ Preschool in Nashville
Replies
5
Views
163
timbo
timbo
Joe Biden: “I Used Teach the Second Amendment in Law School… There Are Limitations… You Couldn’t Own a Cannon!” (VIDEO)
Replies
22
Views
478
REM870
REM870
If Biden were to be elected, what actions could he take to support the Second Amendment (2A)?
Replies
13
Views
310
s&w3913
S
Back
Top Bottom