Oh really?
Show me statistics that show that HKs are more reliable than brand X. Seriously, show me the stats.
I don't have stats but anecdotally I will say that HKs out of the box failure rate is exceptionally low compared to other
brands- but that isn't the be all end all in selecting a firearm. Not to mention admittedly its difficult to gauge this
when most of the competing brands produce an exponentially greater number of pistols. If HK sells 100 pistols in a
month and Glock sells 1000, and both have a 10% defect rate, Glock is always going to look worse while HKs defect rate will get
lost in the weeds. On the other hand I've had a metric shit ton of HKs and I had a total of ONE that "broke".... and even when it
broke, the gun still would have fired and cycled. (My USPc 40 sear spring broke, but it broke in such a way that it turned it into a DAO pistol,
lmao). I used to beat the snot out of them too.
Now if we were talking Smith.... someone definitely pissed in the well over there; hands down HK has better QC than they do but that's
not really that hard to pull off.
-Mike
Last edited: