• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

In State Tuition For Illegals Rearing It's Ugly Head AGAIN

While that's true Mark - there is a lesson in this. When gun bills come up, we need to make sure that WE call our Rep's and Sen's - expecially THIS year - and we need to make sure that our gun club members are doing it as well.

If the number of students that Ed and I have taught over the past 6 years are any indication - gun ownership in this state is going up, albeit slowly, but it's going up. The more of us who make calls and/or send emails, the better.

The more calls they get, the more they'll listen.
 
mark056 said:
Sorry if I pissed on some of your Cheerios good people, but it only shows that the good people of the Commonwealth have displayed some common sense on this issue and this issue alone.

Mark

This is true. One small victory. It shouldn't even be called a victory, it should have never been voted on. [roll] It's pretty sad that we get excited over OUR goverment not giving away free money to illegals. I looked up socialist in Websters it had a picture of Massachusetts. [wink]
 
derek said:
mark056 said:
Sorry if I pissed on some of your Cheerios good people, but it only shows that the good people of the Commonwealth have displayed some common sense on this issue and this issue alone.

Mark

This is true. One small victory. It shouldn't even be called a victory, it should have never been voted on. [roll] It's pretty sad that we get excited over OUR goverment not giving away free money to illegals. I looked up socialist in Websters it had a picture of Massachusetts. [wink]

It's a victory. We shouldn't beat ourselves up on this. Enjoy it for now. Consider it tackling fuel (a-la waterboy) for later.

There is nothing unique about MASS. There are many pro illegal immigration bills being considered all over the country. E.g. Drivers licenses, Work centers, Amnesty, etc.

The good people of the Commonwealth didn't display any good sense on this issue. It was a small vocal majority (US) that intimidated the representatives into voting this down.

Lesson from all this is, which the liberals have been exploiting for years: better to be part of a small vocal majority than a large apathetic majority.

Good work folks.
 
"The good people of the Commonwealth didn't display any good sense on this issue. It was a small vocal majority (US) that intimidated the representatives into voting this down. " S.F.

Senor,

Did you ever stop and consider that just maybe the
small vocal majority (sic) are the good people of the Commonwealth ?


Regards (as when you wish to send the very best [wink] )

Mark
 
mark056 said:
"The good people of the Commonwealth didn't display any good sense on this issue. It was a small vocal majority (US) that intimidated the representatives into voting this down. " S.F.

Senor,

Did you ever stop and consider that just maybe the
small vocal majority (sic) are the good people of the Commonwealth ?


Regards (as when you wish to send the very best [wink] )

Mark

I'm not really up for a pee-ing contest on the net today.

It was the folks who called that won this. Not the folks who quietly agreed or disagreed with it.
 
Forgot to add - the link is the FIRST vote - not the vote on the other 2 amendments. If your Rep voted no on the first, it's best to call their office to ask how they voted on the other two.
 
If you get the small weekly community paper they have a thing called 'Beacon Hill Roll Call' and tells you what was voted on and how they voted. (My rep voted No to all the bills proposed to make life easier for the illegals)
 
Back
Top Bottom