In a world where guns are banned, you'd be safe?

dragonballzz said:
In a world with 0 guns, you'd be safer. Simply because that's 1 less thing that you can get hurt by. That is NOT the reality though.
Click to expand...
In a world with 0 guns, the strongest thugs would be safer.
Lacking concealable ranged weapons, all others would be at the their mercy -- including the once strong, as they age out of their prime beatdown (taking and giving) years.
1729796070691.png
 
Mountain said:
Hitler ~6 million Jewish killed, possibly 11 million total? Stalin ~12 million? Mao 40-80 million.
Click to expand...
if you count total of stalin casualties from 1918 toward his death, it is more than mao had managed to do. it is just way way better hidden and only way to know the amount is by side analysis of the prognosed population growth against the factual one.

tyranny of socialists that allows them uncontrolled stream of benefits requires mandatory factual enslavement of the rest of the population, and it only works with the defenseless masses.
so, the push for total confiscation of weapons will remain unrelentless, as we already are in the factual socialism here, and it just keeps getting worse every year.
 
Reptile said:
Liberty is dangerous.

But, it beats the alternative.


AR15's can be very dangerous guns.
They can kill many people easily when used by evil people.

But to ban them, the government would have the ability to commit genocide against our people and kill millions.

So, it's worth the risk of citizens owning AR's if it could keep a tyrannical in check.
Click to expand...
I’ll take dangerous liberty over safe oppression.
 
paul73 said:
if you count total of stalin casualties from 1918 toward his death, it is more than mao had managed to do. it is just way way better hidden and only way to know the amount is by side analysis of the prognosed population growth against the factual one.

tyranny of socialists that allows them uncontrolled stream of benefits requires mandatory factual enslavement of the rest of the population, and it only works with the defenseless masses.
so, the push for total confiscation of weapons will remain unrelentless, as we already are in the factual socialism here, and it just keeps getting worse every year.
Click to expand...

No way, Stalin had a much lower population to play with, and you can't compare the two in terms of population growth because you'd then have to accurately account for the one child policy, when it began and calculate how often it was followed.
 
G4Y4HK said:
It's interesting to see how in American schools, we teach our kids and drill it over and over again to grieve over the 6 million. But no one gives a shit about the Russians or the Chinese that were snuffed. Not even a numbers comparison, just a worthiness of historical study thing.
Click to expand...
Most kids, even now up to young adult age , were never taught about the mass genocides of the communists. Every time I tell my wife's kids about something like Pol Pot, or Mao, they go look it up like I'm lying. I got made at them once and said, what, you think i'm lying. But they said they had never learned about this in school, and they both have degrees. Everything now adays is America evil. I would love to go sit in on my granddaughters classes, but I would probably get thrown out or arrested.
 
"The arrested man was bailed on Friday pending further enquiries.

Police are continuing to appeal for dashcam footage of the incident.

Detectives said "a lone man" threw a substance at the teenagers before fleeing on an electric scooter along Harrow Road".

Refugee status? No description of "the man"? Sounds familiar... :-/
 
Look at the illegals in England and Europe right now. the actual aren't armed so the illegals literally walk the streets with knives and machetes, which are banned, cutting up anybody they want to. If we ever reach that point,, Forget that,, I Pray we never reach that point and we do something if it ever comes close to happening.
 
G4Y4HK said:
It's interesting to see how in American schools, we teach our kids and drill it over and over again to grieve over the 6 million. But no one gives a shit about the Russians or the Chinese that were snuffed. Not even a numbers comparison, just a worthiness of historical study thing.
Click to expand...

There is a difference in that Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis while the other 64 million people were killed in warfare.

It's a terrible thing to be hunted in your own country. I can barely imagine the horror.

The only comparable situation was the murder of 20 million Chinese civilians by the Japanese in the most horrific ways. But that was on the other side of the world.

Germany's great misfortune is to be in the geographical center of Europe while Britain was protected by 25 miles or more of sea.
 
mibro said:
The only comparable situation was the murder of 20 million Chinese civilians by the Japanese in the most horrific ways. But that was on the other side of the world
Click to expand...

Well, Stalin’s reign probably took out about 6 or 7 million non-war related. And Mao probably around 60 million.
 
Back
Top Bottom