I'm Shocked!

[Admin]

Assualt Weapon wasn't used once in this article.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/09/23/terrorism.probe.ap/index.html

 

[Nickle]

The media is slowly starting to get it. Unfortunately, they do have a LONG ways to go yet.

 

[Lynne]

And from Cnn yet! Good thing I'm sitting down.

 

[SiameseRat]

Do you think it's possible there's a non-anti-gun journalist or was it just a mistake?

 

[Lynne]

Do you think it's possible there's a non-anti-gun journalist or was it just a mistake?

<slap, slap> SR!!! Come to your senses woman!!

Feel better now?

 

[SiameseRat]

Do you think it's possible there's a non-anti-gun journalist or was it just a mistake?

<slap, slap> SR!!! Come to your senses woman!!

Feel better now?

Yeah I didn't get much sleep last night... [lol] [lol] [lol]

 

[Pilgrim]

Just goes to show you that we ARE getting the bad guys here, a little at a time.

 

[Bruce for NH State Rep]

A thought

Does Cali-fornicate-ya have a state-wide Assault Weapons ban? If so, then wouldn't the use of the phrase "assault weapon" in this story serve to highlight its ineffectiveness at preventing these "killing machines" from falling into the wrong hands.

Of course, it could have been a Ruger Mini-14 with a non-scary wood stock, and a Clinton-capacity magazine.

 

[Nickle]

Re: A thought

Does Cali-fornicate-ya have a state-wide Assault Weapons ban? If so, then wouldn't the use of the phrase "assault weapon" in this story serve to highlight its ineffectiveness at preventing these "killing machines" from falling into the wrong hands.

Of course, it could have been a Ruger Mini-14 with a non-scary wood stock, and a Clinton-capacity magazine.

Yes, they have a ban, and they ALL have to be registered, even the pre-ban ones. No new ones in, existing ones registered, no wonder they wouldn't use the AW words. That would be proof that bans don't work.