If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
The stuff that is missing is the bigger part of the story than what is there. Let it stay f***ed up. CT's database was as bad, or worse, years ago and a bunch of well-intentioned, but mis-informed, individuals wanted to 'correct the record' but it was better to leave it f***ed up so that it was mainly a document of irrelevance and could not be used as a basis for anything requiring a court order.
This group was really excited to point out the birthday/expiration connection, which I assume non-LTC holders would have no idea.
I can think of at least two people on here that would argue that with you
Only thing I saw of mine missing is 2 private sales and 1 registration. They were done online and should have been there.
You think the state isn't explaining how they assigned that data to the BloombergBots and the composters at the Globe Spotlight Team? They probably made a PowerPoint for them explaining how to use the data.
The personals database lists personals from 2006-2022 (not 2004-2022 as the title says), so while one shouldn't expect blue cards, paper FA-10's should be in there from 2006 to whenever the last ones were used up or went away (3/15/2015?).
I will take Tassel and Tassel.
Nope. Any of us dopes with so-so Excel skills can use a pivot table, VLOOKUP function, and/or conditional formulas to easily capture all the killy gunz. Maybe an hour of work to slice and dice the data and create some Ross Perot charts?
Second result when googling "When does a Massachusetts LTC expire"
Some helpful information because there is so much doxxing going on..
View: https://youtu.be/QEWpa38djos
Yep, any lawsuit should be to ban the collection of this info and the licensing system in general. They've demonstrated they can't be trusted with the info (unsurprisingly).
Needn't even go that far - I'd expect most people to assume it works like their driver's license.
Except the fact that in order to change laws we need friendly legislators and to strike down the laws we need friendly courts. It’s a long road for sure, but this is something worth fighting for.
So, I think you are saying that criminals smart enough to use the data to select a high-value target, would only hit that target while the occupants are away?
It was old ten pages ago.I live in the forest!!!!!
Hell ya brother!!!! Thank you for agreeing with me!!!! Murica!!!!!
I always new Lawrence was bad but damn!
But you repeat yourself!
Most "reporters" have very few brain cells these days. They "report" what they are handed by police or anti-groups without asking any questions about the validity of the info. Long gone are the days of true "investigative reporters".
If someone is outside, stealing my car, I''ll call the police, and let them take it. It's not my job to handle
For my town, if you look up birthday month and day, 5-20 possible matches come up. If you don't know what someone owns or when their LTC expires, how do you know which ID is the person of interest?I had a bunch of stuff from MA dealers post 2004 and from 3 other MA dealers there's nothing in there when there should be like a dozen guns.Like I have stuff I got from deli ticket emporium, thats in there, but there are like 3 other dealers not reperesneted in there at all.
The only thing completely intact is more recent EFA10 FTF sales/transfers.
Criminals may not be the sharpest knives in the drawer for many things but their little lizard brains get regular exercise compared to the attention higher functions receive. Like animals (and Marxists?) they'll always covet what others have and expend brain power figuring out how to take it rather than just do the work to earn it. They'll always grab the low hanging, unattended fruit first and next in line is to prey on the weak. Furthermore, they don't all have to be smart enough to figure out the list. It only takes one smart shitbird to crack the code and share with his fellow perps or simply sell lists to those who may not be smart but are very brazen.So, I think you are saying that criminals smart enough to use the data to select a high-value target, would only hit that target while the occupants are away?
I suppose that (burglary) is preferable to a home invasion, but it still sucks.
But then yes, if true, "more iron" (i.e., a mucho stronger safe) might help... but probably not as much as a good firearms insurance policy.
60 total over a 17 year period? Is that it? More cars a year are stolen. Its almost as if firearm theft is not an issue.
