Logical fallacies and flat-out lies.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Very interesting piece on the GOAL FB page this morning -
Anti's complain about the NRA and their money, take a look at these "extremists", who of course support the Second Amendment - except for the parts about RKBA and "shall not be infringed" or course. "Nobody wants to take away your guns"...
"Lots of pieces connect here. The Joyce Foundation which spends millions to promote the anti Second Amendment agenda and was once directed by President Obama, also pays David Hemenway who was a major contributor to Speaker DeLeo's "gun viol...ence" committee. Their report provided the genesis of FID suitability and a bunch of other anti 2A amendments which have since been defeated. In addition to that, the Joyce Foundation has been a major contributor to the International Association of Chiefs of Police."
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20110122/ISSUE01/301229980/the-joyce-foundation-the-anti-nra
Do you have a link to that on GOAL's FB page?
Thanks and good find.
They can't add anything that didn't passv either house. The worst we can get is may issue fid. That's the only grievous part that passed through both.
Correct. sorry for the confusion. But, they cannot add anything that was not initially in either bill-so the OGAM, magazine stuff, etc, is off the table. The most grievous thing they can do is the may issue and LEO exemption. But, thanks to the Boston police commissioner, that got national attention. And the dc ruling regarding possessing firearms outside the home, further erodes his stance. They have this week to finish it, time is short.May isue did not pass both. It passed house and the senate voted on am amendment 38 to 10 to remove suitability for FID
Boston Herald today has an article talking about Boston PD's low rate in solving homicides. They are saying most of they ones they don't solve involve guns. Full court press by MCOPA, and some other group like Bloomberg to get their suitability back in. They never thought they would have to work like this until about 10 days ago. All of a sudden everyday there is an "article" which either directly or indirectly points to a "need" for more gun control. Disgusting. The worst part is the sheep eat this stuff up, most people don't even question how these issues are suddenly being brought to light.
they haven't solved this one yet either
http://www.celebrateboston.com/crime/swedish-nanny-murder.htm
didnt the nazis use the media as their propaganda machine?
******Boston Herald today has an article talking about Boston PD's low rate in solving homicides. They are saying most of they ones they don't solve involve guns. Full court press by MCOPA, and some other group like Bloomberg to get their suitability back in. They never thought they would have to work like this until about 10 days ago. All of a sudden everyday there is an "article" which either directly or indirectly points to a "need" for more gun control. Disgusting. The worst part is the sheep eat this stuff up, most people don't even question how these issues are suddenly being brought to light.
Boston Herald today has an article talking about Boston PD's low rate in solving homicides. They are saying most of they ones they don't solve involve guns. Full court press by MCOPA, and some other group like Bloomberg to get their suitability back in. They never thought they would have to work like this until about 10 days ago. All of a sudden everyday there is an "article" which either directly or indirectly points to a "need" for more gun control. Disgusting. The worst part is the sheep eat this stuff up, most people don't even question how these issues are suddenly being brought to light.
Boston Herald today has an article talking about Boston PD's low rate in solving homicides. They are saying most of they ones they don't solve involve guns. Full court press by MCOPA, and some other group like Bloomberg to get their suitability back in. They never thought they would have to work like this until about 10 days ago. All of a sudden everyday there is an "article" which either directly or indirectly points to a "need" for more gun control. Disgusting. The worst part is the sheep eat this stuff up, most people don't even question how these issues are suddenly being brought to light.
The Herald article mentioned ballistic testing didn't really say it was a crock and has never solved a crime but the inference is that it is needed and even more so now.
liberalist pos rag
Ya gotta wonder if the Palmer vs. DC ruling has the conference committee re-thinking suitability...
NAH, that would make too much sense!
This has to be passed by both chambers this week right?
******The silence from the conference committee is deafening. Has anybody seen/heard anything at all so far this afternoon?
I saw an earlier post from someone indicating that if the bill made it out of conference committee it could be voted on at any time thereafter (meaning even next session), but I'm no expert on MA legislative procedures.