Healey Suspends Enforcement of Long Gun Roster

I checked my Ibooks pdf save from the law and Section 153 is in there. Not sure how we all missed it but I was under the impression FID holders were instant felons.

@CrackPot
 
Not sure why, but reading this inspired me to ask if NES (paying members) could do a class action law suit against mura for deprivation of constitutional rights?

Just a curious thought. I’m sure if it was a thing I’d absolutely not be the first to suggest it.

You should be the lead plaintiff and tell the judge how Mura caused you emotional distress.
 
I have to apologize. It could be all the concussions too… with a side of retard

I think that side of retard might actually have been the main dish..............................................................just kidding 😆, I enjoy deciphering your posts.
 
I can do Braille if it helps. [laugh]
I’m terrified. I’m gonna miss this appointment
About one second away from the sign language


I hate go to the hospital cause I always ask dumb shit like did you bring weapon? I was like well. This is Springfield.

One weirdest things ever done.. no weapon with trying to x-ray me with
My kevlar on


I had to edit this like 45 times because I can’t hear or speak

Takes three f***ing years to get a doctors appointment. It’s insane.

I can finally walk, but I can’t see her here so I don’t know where the f*** I’m going
 
If you’re hired and incompetent lawyer, at least you can try again… not so much with the doctors. I don’t think i’m gonna let them. put me under.


Would you get some tie straps and they could hold me down.
 
Of all the things I survived you gotta figure like this stupid bitch is gonna do it
 
Have you ever boarded a aircraft looked at the retard flying and thought of f*** I’m gonna have to leave this plane myself.. goddamn miracle of survive this…

Unfortunately not. The amount of time I spent on NES has normalized retards for me that they no longer stand out.
 
Unfortunately not. The amount of time I spent on NES has normalized retards for me that they no longer stand out.
I’m pretty sure I’m gonna die. But to get an Uber cause I didn’t have $1500 for an ambulance.
I’m gonna get dropped off in Springfield. I have no plans leaving.
 
If I have to buy f*** pants on. I’m pretty sure I need f***ing business.
 
An AR lower is NOT a banned firearm.

Frames (subject to the firearm roster) and receivers are now regulated under MGL but not prohibited.

Er..


An AR lower falls under "Assault-style firearm", therefore if it was not IN MASS on 8/1, possession is in fact banned.

Not *ALL* AR lowers are banned, because 8/1 ones exist and are legal to own.

But unlike handguns where you can have anything so long as you didn't break any laws to acquire it, new AR lowers are essentially banned.
 
Er..


An AR lower falls under "Assault-style firearm", therefore if it was not IN MASS on 8/1, possession is in fact banned.

Not *ALL* AR lowers are banned, because 8/1 ones exist and are legal to own.

But unlike handguns where you can have anything so long as you didn't break any laws to acquire it, new AR lowers are essentially banned.

[[Citation Needed]]
 
Maybe a little birdie told her that even her packed MASJC can't uphold that part because it is a violation of black letter federal law. FFL's cannot legally comply with it either. They could lose their FFL. But then maybe that is why Healey wants.
 
[[Citation Needed]]


Ch. 135
Section 20: An unfinished frame or receiver is a firearm

Section 16, paragraph f: An AR (or lower since that is now defined as a firearm) is a copy or duplicate of an enumerated assault style firearm, unless it was made originally with a fixed mag. Cannot have had the ability to accept a detacheable magazine previously,

You can’t even legally have a new bolt action AR if it could accept a Colt AR-15 upper, now that I’m reading it. **

The enumerated assault style firearm paragraph (e) of Section 16 does not apparently depend on the rifle/pistol being semi-automatic. And all the current bolt action/lever action ARs have interchangeable receivers with Colt AR-15s (one of the checks for copy/duplicate status).

** But, further thinking, the original Colt AR-15 had a larger pivot pin. So modern mil-spec lowers are not interchangeable with a Colt AR-15s. It would be dependent on “substantially similar internal construction and configuration”
 
Maybe a little birdie told her that even her packed MASJC can't uphold that part because it is a violation of black letter federal law. FFL's cannot legally comply with it either. They could lose their FFL. But then maybe that is why Healey wants.

Please don't talk about her ex-girlfriend like that.
 
Ch. 135
Section 20: An unfinished frame or receiver is a firearm

Section 16, paragraph f: An AR (or lower since that is now defined as a firearm) is a copy or duplicate of an enumerated assault style firearm, unless it was made originally with a fixed mag. Cannot have had the ability to accept a detacheable magazine previously,

You can’t even legally have a new bolt action AR if it could accept a Colt AR-15 upper, now that I’m reading it. **

The enumerated assault style firearm paragraph (e) of Section 16 does not apparently depend on the rifle/pistol being semi-automatic. And all the current bolt action/lever action ARs have interchangeable receivers with Colt AR-15s (one of the checks for copy/duplicate status).

** But, further thinking, the original Colt AR-15 had a larger pivot pin. So modern mil-spec lowers are not interchangeable with a Colt AR-15s. It would be dependent on “substantially similar internal construction and configuration”

See what further thinking does? Be like Pappy. Don't be like Milktree and / or Pastera
 
Back
Top Bottom