Group sues to protect rare butterfly

Admin

Staff Member
Administrator
Moderator
NES Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2005
Messages
43,708
Likes
47,175
Location
Monadnock area, NH
Feedback: 18 / 0 / 0
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/01/06/rare.butterfly.ap/index.html

RENO, Nevada (AP) -- Conservationists sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on Thursday seeking protection for a rare butterfly they say is threatened by off-road vehicles at one of the largest sand dunes in the West.

Environmentalists want the agency to declare the Sand Mountain blue butterfly an endangered species because, they say, its habitat is being destroyed at the only place it is known to live -- the Sand Mountain Recreation Area in western Nevada.

The Bureau of Land Management controls activities at the dune, which is 600 feet tall and stretches for two miles. It attracts an estimated 50,000 off-roaders annually on motorcycles, dune buggies and all-terrain vehicles.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Sacramento, California, accuses the agency of violating the Endangered Species Act by failing to respond to petitions since April 2004 seeking federal protection for the butterfly. The act requires the government to provide a preliminary response to such petitions within 90 days and often again within a year.

Plaintiffs accuse the Bureau of Land Management of pandering to off-roaders.

"It's a stall tactic coming out of hostile politics in Washington," said Daniel Patterson, a desert ecologist for Arizona's Center for Biological Diversity, which is suing along with the Nevada Outdoor Recreation Association and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.

Bob Williams, Nevada supervisor for the Fish and Wildlife Service, blamed lack of money for the agency's inaction.

"We only get a certain amount of money a year to do listing findings," Williams said. Most of it was spent on sage grouse and pygmy rabbit reviews in the past two years, he said.

The Fish and Wildlife Service hopes to spend about $35,000 on a 90-day review -- probably beginning in June -- to determine whether there is enough evidence to warrant a full, yearlong review of the butterfly, Williams said.

"We do know the butterfly is there, and we haven't been able to find it at any other location," he said.

The butterfly depends on a unique shrub, the Kearney buckwheat, which covers about 1,000 of the recreation area's 4,795 acres. It is found nowhere else.

The Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Land Management have been working with local groups to save the butterfly without necessarily listing it as endangered. Tentative plans call for more signs designating approved travel routes, fencing to protect the habitat and additional law enforcement.

Many off-roaders oppose a federal listing.

"If it did become listed, no telling what type of restrictions they could do out there," said Richard Hilton of Reno, a board member of the Friends of Sand Mountain, a group composed primarily of off-road enthusiasts.

If this species only exists in such a small area and only eats one plant, evolution doesn't intend it to survive.
 
"We only get a certain amount of money a year to do listing findings," Williams said. Most of it was spent on sage grouse and pygmy rabbit reviews in the past two years, he said.

The Fish and Wildlife Service hopes to spend about $35,000 on a 90-day review -- probably beginning in June -- to determine whether there is enough evidence to warrant a full, yearlong review of the butterfly, Williams said.

What I find disturbing is thinking about how a homeless shelter could run for a year for the 90 day $$ they need to decide if they should spend more money on tracking down a butterfly. And how much money they already spent on grouse and pygmy rabbits...

I'm all for saving the environment, but couldn't they just buy property with that money instead of putting it into something that has no real effect?

Am I wrong?
 
<note> pardon my ineloquence in the previous post. It doesn't read very well, hopefully you get what I was saying- They're wasting $35,000 on a 90 day REVIEW. They're spending that money to decide if they're going to spend money on a study... [roll] [roll] [roll]
My brainy no worky...
 
One of the really irritating things about this is the fact that, based on a lot of previous actions by similar groups, the "Sand Mountain blue butterfly" probably isn't even a species, much less an endangered species. You've got some butterflies from a particular species who have found their way to an area that's isolated from others of their kind. There's absolutely no difference between them and all the others except for their location. Then along comes some "environmental" activist, i.e., somebody who neither knows shit about the environment nor gives a shit about it, but is pathologically opposed to development and other people enjoying themselves. "Ooh, look! A unique life form that exists nowhere else in the universe! Everybody has to stop what they're doing so that we can protect it." Well, bring on the bleepin' bug spray say I. Problem solved.

I'm all in favor of protecting truely endangered species (unless we're talking about an endangered flea, mosquito or pathological virus), but this kind of thing is the equivalent of running across a couple dozen people from California who now find themselves living in the People's Republic of Massachusetts and declaring them an protected racial minority.

Ken
 
KMaurer said:
I'm all in favor of protecting truely endangered species (unless we're talking about an endangered flea, mosquito or pathological virus), but this kind of thing is the equivalent of running across a couple dozen people from California who now find themselves living in the People's Republic of Massachusetts and declaring them an protected racial minority.

+1
 
"It's a stall tactic coming out of hostile politics in Washington," said Daniel Patterson, a desert ecologist for Arizona's Center for Biological Diversity, which is suing along with the Nevada Outdoor Recreation Association and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.

Don't you people see that it's all BUSH'S fault??? [roll]
 
Back
Top Bottom