I think FPC does great work. And I understand the conditions of oral arguments don't allow time for PowerPoint presentation by the plaintiffs to educate the judges involved. But it's getting to a point where ignorance is almost a strategy. The judges seem to agree that MA residents should be able to obtain off-roster handguns, or that there shouldn't be barrier involved. That's a better development than before. But without an opportunity to educate the court, the chances of anything meaningful happen are low. I think it would've been helpful if FPC had a lawyer that understood MA laws better because the 1st could care less about Bruen or the 2A. They have the job for life and, should they retire, will have an even better paying job at an Ivy League school somewhere.
I maintain that Bruen is awesome, but it's not as awesome as some people think it is.