TZCHRIS
NES Member
Sorry if I confused you, I was first asking about carrying concealed (glock 27) but while on the subject of guns in cars I went off subject a little and asked about transporting my AR. All good info, thanks for the replys.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
In the eyes of the law, an AR15 and a Ruger 10/22 are equally evil. Both are semi-auto, high capacity rifles and thus evil baby killers.
Last I looked, the Ruger 10/22 was not considered to be large capacity.
The last time I purchased a pistol I brought my own lockable case for transporting it home. I have a Chrysler minivan that has "stow and go" seats and just put the case in the storage area in front of the seat and put the floor mats in place. Everything is lock up and out of sight.
Depends on who you ask. Some dealers think they are and thus won't sell them to a FID holder. Score another win for ambiguity!
Ruger, and other manufacturers make 25-round magazines for the 10-22, but they are not sold standard with the rifle. I assume these magazines are prohibited in MA.Last I looked, the Ruger 10/22 was not considered to be large capacity.
Ruger, and other manufacturers make 25-round magazines for the 10-22, but they are not sold standard with the rifle. I assume these magazines are prohibited in MA.
Last I looked, the Ruger 10/22 was not considered to be large capacity.
Some models do ship with the 25 round Ruger-branded magazine.
As I recently posted in another thread, this is an issue which also impacts the Ruger Mini-14.
Originally, both were shipped from the manufacturer with only 10-round magazines, and were therefore FID compliant. Recently, Ruger has started shipping some models with magazines in excess of 10 rounds.
The unanswered question is whether the models that ship with 10-round magazines are still FID compliant, or are both rifles now considered large capacity, making FID holders who own one instant felons.
It's become a gray area.
I did get an answer from Ron Glidden on this, but he and I both agree that the DEFINITIVE answer will be what any DA considers it!
So it's a gray area now.
And that would be just peachy for the folks with FIDs who currently have Mini-14s or 10/22s.
I did get an answer from Ron Glidden on this....
The mats are put back in place to hide the fact there is a storage underneath. As I said the firearm is in a locked container and in the storage area. Out of sight out of mind so to speak.I don't think floor mats would be considered a "lock" by most of our fine constabulary.
Not to be pedantic, but what you got was an opinion.
The mats are put back in place to hide the fact there is a storage underneath. As I said the firearm is in a locked container and in the storage area. Out of sight out of mind so to speak.
The mats are put back in place to hide the fact there is a storage underneath. As I said the firearm is in a locked container and in the storage area. Out of sight out of mind so to speak.
OK, it is the "opinion" of GCAB that it is still FID compliant.
Not to pick nits, but what you might get from a DA is an indictment!
What we need is a list of what it's OK to have.....I'm sure that's a novel concept......
/sarcasm