Interesting...what was it about the Sigs and HKs that didn't work for you?
For starters, my HKs and Sigs being sold were mostly a victim of circumstance. If I hadn't needed the money I would have kept most of them at least for nostalgic purposes. I do miss a few of them but not badly enough that I feel compelled to go back. When I had to sell guns I sold guns that were the least practical or I didn't shoot well, with a few exceptions... that means the Glocks stayed and everything else went.... for a few reasons...
-I can shoot a glock halfway decent.
-For some bizarre reason, with the exception of the MK23 I had, I could never really hold onto the USP .45 series guns I had that well without my support hand grip slipping all over the place or coming loose. Meanwhile I can pick up a G21SF and hold onto it like a vise with my support hand, because the grip circumference sucks less.
-I have a relative crap-ton of "preban" FML, DF, Glock mags, for nearly every Glock made except for the G23.
-Glock parts are easy to get, and with rare exceptions the guns are user serviceable. I can hit 3 places within an hour of me that will have most Glock parts that I would ever need. Good luck doing that with an HK or a Sig without getting on the phone and whining to someone for parts, etc.
-For some bizarre reason every time I pick up something like a P30, HK45, P2000, VP9, etc, My natural point of aim with those guns is low, and it sucks. It's not something you really notice at first because you just compensate for it by bringing the sights up, but the whole act of bringing the sights up" is unnatural to me. On every other platform, like a Glock, or a 1911....or even Sigs, the front sight is either a tad high or not very far off the notch. Maybe it's because I've been running Glocks for too long, I dunno.
-Sigs and HKs are the width of a friggan school bus. The upshot of this is you get lots of recoiling mass and heavy resistance against limp wristing, the downside of this is, school bus I used to carry mine IWB and while they worked just fine, it was kinda funny transiting between like my P2000 and the first Glock 19 I got... the G19 was much easier to carry IWB because of that little bit of extra thin-ness.
-Most of the newer Sig and HK products have a trigger that leaves a lot to be desired. The only exceptions to this are the VP9, the P320, and some of the single action Sigs like the X-Five. I got lucky on my old guns because a lot of them
either had action work done to them or were just made in an era where they sucked less.
At one point I owned....
Sigs: 1 x P226 9mm (from the nitron madness era) 2 x P228 9mm, one black, one factory nickel plated, both proof marked germans. 1 x P220 black, proof marked german. 2 x P229, domestic .40s, black. P239, 9mm, Black. Sig X-Five Competition 9mm, Stainless. I also had a P220-ST that was the biggest piece of shit on the planet, it ran well but the trigger was creepy as
**** and nobody could ever figure out why. The SA trigger creep on that gun bugged the shit out of me. Out of all these guns the only ones I really miss are the Black P228 and the P229 I had, as well as the X-Five, because that gun was just plain fun to shoot because hitting gongs at 50 yards with that thing was like cheating.
HK: HK USPc .40, USPc .45, USP .40 full, USP .45 full, USP Tactical .45, USP Elite .45, HK MK23 .45, HK45 fullsize LEM, P2000 .40 LEM, P7M8. Only ones out of this bunch I really miss are the P7M8 and the MK23 SOCOM I had.
The thing is though, even though I miss a few of those guns, Those guns are not anywhere near the top of the list anymore... I got a bunch of Dan Wessons and CZ products to buy before I even get close to that. (The CZ disease is something like a crack addiction, this guy probably has it too...)
-Mike