- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
- Messages
- 47,502
- Likes
- 33,495
The entire game is trying to goad a candidate into announcing his position on an unheard case while the candidate attempts to avoid any such discussion.
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Feinstein says "assault weapons" are not in common use
- Thread starter Obie1
- Start date
StevieP
NES Member
And growing daily. I'd go so far as to say tens of millions
fshalor
NES Member
Most cellphones are in pockets or nightstands. Most cars are in parking lots or driveways. Most hammers are in tool bags boxes or workshops or stores ..
Wait, there's a hammer in Feinstein? Where do I send a thank you card?
GM-GUY
NES Member
Fine Di-Fi, let’s say you get your wish and they are banned and ordered to be turned in, NOW WHAT? You have MILLIONS (perhaps as many as 20 Million) ARs and let’s say one million owners and to be charitable 90% compliance.
100,000 well armed and trained, pissed off PATRIOTS are left - would you like a history lesson?
100,000 well armed and trained, pissed off PATRIOTS are left - would you like a history lesson?
The flappy thing m8, fully semiautomatic high capacity clips, you know what I mean? The loopholes fear universal background checks, high caliber 22's, and common sense. God, damn, why won't anyone see it and think of the children, the NRA are terrorists can't you see how they're colluding with the Russians.
f*** think I'm having a stroke...
-Senator Feinstein as dictated by Bloomberg et al.
I went and posted this on the hag's FB page.
Would have been more effective if you took a picture of yourself putting your AR to common use.
When I get settled back in NH I'll have a place to shoot it. Just waiting for a job to get back home!
KBCraig
NES Member
I would personally pay for Don Willett's plane ticket.
KBCraig
NES Member
Maybe it's more sinister. If weapons not being used are not in common use, does that mean that safe storage requirements mean that your firearms are no longer in use and therefore not protected by the 2a?
This is what the MA newspapers reported a while back when BPD tried to buy patrol rifles a la long guns a while back.
This new "use" definition sounded like she wants to go down a similar path as: "the definition of is, is".
You win. Close the internet.
She's about as gun ignorant as they come, just look at her trigger discipline:
This^
BTW, it's well documented that when she was mayor of SF, she carried a .38 revolver for protection.
But remember, her life is so much more valuable than ours, so that makes it OK.
"Its not in common use because you're not using it; youre not using it because of safe storage requirements."
I guess she is advocating for me being in a continuous state of "using" dozens of guns at the same time. Is carrying them on me sufficient, or do I need to be actively firing them, and if so what frequency (how many boolits per day)? Is she going to then complain that I am walking around with guns dangling off of me?
She's about as gun ignorant as they come, just look at her trigger discipline:
This^
BTW, it's well documented that when she was mayor of SF, she carried a .38 revolver for protection.
But remember, her life is so much more valuable than ours, so that makes it OK.
Butt she was not carrying a fully semi automatic, so everything was ok...
Dennis in MA
NES Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2007
- Messages
- 38,167
- Likes
- 33,119
Methinks if Trump got a 3rd pick that Roberts or someone would suddenly slide Left to help "balance" things. A crock for sure, but I can't see them going 6-3 as much as I'd love it. (Kagan is still, on most issues, a Constitutionalist as well, so it could go 7-2. That would be funnier.)
You mean these things won't happen??? Should I put my P-hat away yet??? Maybe stop staring at a livestream camera shouting "he will not divide us"??? (Remember that one??? LOL). Damn. 18 months in and hte world has NOT ended yet.
Hey hey hey - let's not get their panty-waists in too much of a bunch too quickly.
VetteGirlMA
NES Member
To me a more interesting question is this. I think it’s safe to say that Feinstein is never going to vote for Kavanaugh but let’s say she asked the assault weapon question and judge Kavanaugh replied with “you know sentator your right. No one should have a weapon like that.”. Does anyone think for a second that DiFi would say “you got my vote Judge” because I can’t imagine that scenario happening in any of a number of alternate universes. These are all just set up questions.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 41,857
- Likes
- 79,505
I never understood the case for calling an "Assault Rifle" a "Modern Sporting Rifle" to placate the whims of others to brand my choice of defense tools in such a way as to make them sound repugnant or less appealing.
I come at it from a different aspect. ALL my firearms are "Assault Rifles" or "Assault Weapons", from my black-powder smoke poles, to my Single Action Army Revolvers, and also include break-open single-shot .22 rifles all the way up to a drum-fed AK or AR.
When my Gun Rights are under "Assault" from Politicians and Governmental Entities or Soccer Moms who "just don't like guns" and are at risk of being stolen from my hands or the hands of my friends, relatives and cohorts...
ALL my Firearms are Assault Weapons...
~Matt
And at the bottom of several local lakes following "boat accidents."
one-eyed Jack
Manufacturer
Does she know that AR 15s without any evil features are not assault weapons? Jack.
Shark_Cage
NES Member
Gross, gross, gross
Similar threads
