So according to California, it is NECESSARY for the state aka taxpayers to pay for some inmate's sex change, but it isn't necessary to own ARs?
It's called the bill of rights. Neither the bill of needs, nor the bill of necessities.
I'm just waiting for some people to start taking those nutcases out JFK style.
I fear this, because I have a feeling that is what they are waiting for, to have an excuse to try and forgo the legal 'niceties' . When people get scared, they will allow anything to go, just to "be safe.. Like the patriot act.
I remember arguing with my mother about the patriot act when it came through.
" Wouldn't you like to lose a bit of privacy, if it meant being safe?"
"No, I'd rather take the risk, and keep my privacy and liberty."
Kaldone, I'm not sure how familiar you are with the 1960s but what frenchman said is the reason we have the GCA of 1968. JFK, MLK Jr, and RFK being assassinated (with guns) all led to the public going along with the democrats (I'm sure Republicans voted for it too) enacting the GCA 68 which is where most of the BS laws on guns come from.