• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Federal judge orders AG Healey to appear for deposition Dec 13th

Mike S said:
FYI
Click to expand...

the npr new policy is to take no more live opposing views unless they are "contextualized" -code word for edited to npr's advantage.

from breitbart news:
NPR listeners were apparently outraged that anyone from Breitbart News had been given an opportunity to defend the website and its chairman.
In her response, “Listeners: Two Recent Interviews Are ‘Normalizing Hate Speech’,” Jensen concluded that the live format had allowed Pollak to get the better of host Steve Inskeep.
She suggested that future interviews be taped: “In addition, in my opinion, these interviews should not be done live. Inskeep is an excellent live interviewer, but live interviews are difficult, especially when there is limited time. A little contextualizing never hurts.”
 
W.E.C said:
the npr new policy is to take no more live opposing views unless they are "contextualized" -code word for edited to npr's advantage.

from breitbart news:
NPR listeners were apparently outraged that anyone from Breitbart News had been given an opportunity to defend the website and its chairman.
In her response, “Listeners: Two Recent Interviews Are ‘Normalizing Hate Speech’,” Jensen concluded that the live format had allowed Pollak to get the better of host Steve Inskeep.
She suggested that future interviews be taped: “In addition, in my opinion, these interviews should not be done live. Inskeep is an excellent live interviewer, but live interviews are difficult, especially when there is limited time. A little contextualizing never hurts.”
Click to expand...
*******
Trump should cancel all funding for the "Public" radio on his first day.
 
RImike said:
She keeps dropping all these "constitution" references and "bill of rights"

I'm using quotes intentionally as she picks and chooses with a whim rights to protect.
Click to expand...

It's ok for the cast of Hamilton to say shit about the VP-elect...cuz free speech and Constitution...bad for Pence/Trump to say anything though cuz.....islamaxenohomoraciphoiba & bigotry. [hmmm]
 
Last edited:
hminsky said:
The whole idea of the AG suing an oil company for fraud because they "knew about global warming" is just so so so wrong. It reminds me of the Italians arresting geologists for not predicting that earthquake. Or for the Libyans arresting a bunch of medical workers for "spreading AIDS". It's like she thinks she's been appointed chief enforcer for some liberal dictatorship. She is a danger to freedom and an embarrassment to our democracy. I hope she goes to jail for something soon.
Click to expand...

She's just keeping herself in the national spotlight. Or at least the Dem-Leadership spotlight.

What is wrong is no one calls some of these d-bags for doing this. What she is doing violates her oath as a lawyer. She can't knowingly bring false suit. Yet no one would DARE challenge her on that. Her argument is a complete debacle of the law and everyone knows it. Call her on it once in federal court and all of this crap would go away. It's like lib's having no issue with candidates speaking at churches as long as the churches are liberal. ????

Bill Katt said:
It's ok for the cast of Hamilton to say shit about the VP-elect...cuz free speech and Constitution...bad for Pence/Trump to say anything though cuz.....islamaxenohomoraciphoiba & bigotry. [hmmm]
Click to expand...

Had theDonald shut up, thePence would have hit it out of the park and it'd look like the Hammyrappers were morons. Pence IS the guy you want them going after. Because his retort is spectacular.
 
Dennis in MA said:
She's just keeping herself in the national spotlight. Or at least the Dem-Leadership spotlight.

What is wrong is no one calls some of these d-bags for doing this. What she is doing violates her oath as a lawyer. She can't knowingly bring false suit. Yet no one would DARE challenge her on that. Her argument is a complete debacle of the law and everyone knows it. Call her on it once in federal court and all of this crap would go away. It's like lib's having no issue with candidates speaking at churches as long as the churches are liberal. ????
Click to expand...


She ought to be disbarred. Honestly. She's acting in bad faith 100% of the time now.
 
She is angling for the governors seat now that a fed position is 8 years away.
and chuck the cuck baker is helping her take it.
 
The good news is that the federal judge in Texas isn't buying her BS about deceiving investors and the public on GW because he knows that her actions are politically motivated. Have a nice trip to Texas, Maura! I can't wait to read your deposition. It's "very rare" for a sitting AG to be deposed, but you managed to pull it off. I bet that you wished you hadn't, but the power went to your head like a good Clintonista; now deal with it!


[FONT=&amp]Attorney General Maura Healey must defend her probe of *Exxon Mobil’s climate-change policy in a Texas courtroom hearing that one prominent analyst says shows a federal judge sees “big-time political motives” in her use of power.[/FONT][FONT=&amp]The order issued by Judge Ed Kinkeade late last week, could compel a law-enforcement officer to answer a target firm’s questions in a Dallas courtroom deposition Dec. 13. First Amendment attorney Harvey Silverglate said it’s “very rare” for a sitting attorney general to be ordered to court for a deposition.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]“It indicates that the judge suspects big-time political motives,” Silverglate told the Herald, adding he sees Healey’s probe as “political grandstanding .... There is nothing really to be gained here except to embarrass the company. There is no legislation in this country thus far making it a crime to oppose global warming.”[/FONT]
Click to expand...

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/lo...rder_to_dallas_court_for_exxon_mobile_climate
 
Last edited:
W.E.C said:
the npr new policy is to take no more live opposing views unless they are "contextualized" -code word for edited to npr's advantage.

from breitbart news:
NPR listeners were apparently outraged that anyone from Breitbart News had been given an opportunity to defend the website and its chairman.
In her response, “Listeners: Two Recent Interviews Are ‘Normalizing Hate Speech’,” Jensen concluded that the live format had allowed Pollak to get the better of host Steve Inskeep.
She suggested that future interviews be taped: “In addition, in my opinion, these interviews should not be done live. Inskeep is an excellent live interviewer, but live interviews are difficult, especially when there is limited time. A little contextualizing never hurts.”
Click to expand...

Pedanticism Warning On!

I know that some people lump all public radio and television together in one big bucket, but that's not really accurate. I find the reporting of National Public Radio (NPR) to be fairly even-handed, informative, not inaccurate. NPR has done a number of really good Second Amendment and gun rights type of stories. WGBH and WBUR are NOT NPR, they are affiliates. They carry these NPR stories as part of syndicated shows like Morning Edition and All Things Considered.

On the other hand, content like the David Braudie and Marjorie whatever-her-name-is show are NOT reporting, are not news, and are not NPR. They're nothing more than sophisticated talk shows where everyone, including the hosts, has an opinion. They don't claim to be neutral and they are not.
 
Last edited:
Knuckle Dragger said:
Pedanticism Warning On!

I know that some people lump all public radio and television together in one big bucket, but that's not really accurate. I find the reporting of National Public Radio (NPR) to be fairly even-handed, informative, not inaccurate. NPR has done a number of really good Second Amendment and gun rights type of stories. WGBH and WBUR are NOT NPR, they are affiliates. They carry these NPR stories as part of syndicated shows like Morning Edition and All Things Considered.

On the other hand, content like the David Brudnoy and Marjorie whatever-her-name-is show are NOT reporting, are not news, and are not NPR. They're nothing more than sophisticated talk shows where everyone, including the hosts, has an opinion. They don't claim to be neutral and they are not.
Click to expand...

David Brudnoy was awesome (RIP). You mean Braude
 
Last edited:
Looks like Healey thinks she is above the feds and foolishly thinks she won't be arrested by US Marshals. She doesn't seem to understand that pissing off the federal judiciary isn't a career enhancement. Even liberal judges won't appreciate the disrespect she shows their institution.
 
Waher said:
Looks like Healey thinks she is above the feds and foolishly thinks she won't be arrested by US Marshals. She doesn't seem to understand that pissing off the federal judiciary isn't a career enhancement. Even liberal judges won't appreciate the disrespect she shows their institution.
Click to expand...

She is safe here. Even the sharpest legal pencils haven't been able to attenuate her injustices.
 
I think you guys are misinterpreting her statement. I don't think she means that she is just going to ignore the judge's order. I think she means that she is going to appeal it and she thinks she will win the appeal.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
The federal judge in texas isnt going to like that
If IMO a court had no standing im sure i could just not show up and fight it on appeal.

Im fairly cetain if a federal judge orders you to appear it doesnt matter if the judge has standing or not on a perticular case its in your best interest to show up.

If i was the judge id definitely send the marshals and have them take here on a week long bus ride to TX stopping at every small town lockup instead of a hotel and airfare... thats what we the unwashed masses would get.

- - - Updated - - -

M1911 said:
I think you guys are misinterpreting her statement. I don't think she means that she is just going to ignore the judge's order. I think she means that she is going to appeal it and she thinks she will win the appeal.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I wonder if thats the case...
 
M1911 said:
I think you guys are misinterpreting her statement. I don't think she means that she is just going to ignore the judge's order. I think she means that she is going to appeal it and she thinks she will win the appeal.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I would say that she is ignoring the order by not showing up
Asked if she planned to go to Texas for the deposition, Healey said, "No, I don't, and we'll take it up on appeal."
Click to expand...

What are the legal ramifications for not showing up to a deposition?
 
Knuckle Dragger said:
Pedanticism Warning On!

I know that some people lump all public radio and television together in one big bucket, but that's not really accurate. I find the reporting of National Public Radio (NPR) to be fairly even-handed, informative, not inaccurate. NPR has done a number of really good Second Amendment and gun rights type of stories. WGBH and WBUR are NOT NPR, they are affiliates. They carry these NPR stories as part of syndicated shows like Morning Edition and All Things Considered.

On the other hand, content like the David Braudie and Marjorie whatever-her-name-is show are NOT reporting, are not news, and are not NPR. They're nothing more than sophisticated talk shows where everyone, including the hosts, has an opinion. They don't claim to be neutral and they are not.
Click to expand...

I love tv pbs, and npr is very informative , but even when the game show " wait,wait don't tell me " questons are all president trump attacks, they are too far left -and blatant socialists,
only in the live interviews do the conservative facts get aired in opposition to the b.s view they are selling.

and the npr reach is unbelievable.
my car antenna broke off on the way from the cape to the north east kingdom, and the only thing that I recieved was one NPR station after the next!
 

Similar threads

Nashville School Shooting: Federal Judge Orders Release of Transgender Shooter’s Journals
Replies
7
Views
262
bejay
B
Federal Judge Rules Millions Of NRA Members Exempt From ATF Pistol Brace Rule
Replies
12
Views
537
1919FAN
1919FAN
District Judge: Gun Ban For Illegal Immigrant Unconstitutional
2 3 4
Replies
96
Views
3K
Kurtz
Kurtz
Tyrant NY judge says Second Amendment doesn't exist in her court room
2
Replies
32
Views
680
TG Pioneer
TG Pioneer
A conservative judge cant be that stupid.
Replies
27
Views
668
BigTimber
BigTimber
Back
Top Bottom