That's cool, we'll rent some servers in Russia.
Vasily, I cannot figure out how to check feedback score
Allow me to show you comrade.
Last edited:
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS February Giveaway ***Canik TP9SF Elite***
That's cool, we'll rent some servers in Russia.
Vasily, I cannot figure out how to check feedback score
Allow me to show you comrade.
Putin is not sure if he approves of NES.
Regardless of whether this is bogus or not, nice job of outing yourself, Barry. Having a "Ready For Hillary" party soon?
Nope it does not apply to anything as:
All*laws*which are*repugnant to the Constitution*are*null and void.” (Marbury vs. Madison, 1803.)*..
Gun gun gun... gun gun gu gun. Sir you can't say gun on the Internet. I said it's not like I have a gun. You still said gun focker
Nailed it!Well that makes sense when the people are considered the enemy.
Well that makes sense when the people are considered the enemy.
They're using that exact interpretation of ITAR to stop distribution of printed gun files.
While the author is being grandiose, the ITAR law is being expanded in EXACTLY that fashion incrementally. The same exact way the ATF keeps using existing law to try and ban specific ammo as armor piercing.
Yes, I'm Obama because I use common sense and critical thinking. You're actually praising Obama with that one.
Didn't go the way you thought it would, did it?!
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fight this?
Could someone post a link or a draft of an email as to what to say fight this bill?
Regardless of the actual language in the bill, and it being a valid constitutional issue,
I actually think this is but another step on that "slippery slope".\
ggboy
I do, but there are laws against that as well.
It's not a bill, it's an executive order, the only way to fight it is to deal with the executive branch or to challenge it in court.
Putin is always sure. There are many servers in France and other EU countries lawyers and wipe their ass with subpenas.
Oh, I get it....obama has NOTHING to do with the State Department. He only knows about anything by hearing it on the news. Been carrying water for the obama regime long? Do you actually own a gun, or are you just a troll?
But...but...but, according to our resident (short term, non green) obama bumkisser, the State Dept, is responsible. Hmmm, the State Dept issues Executive Orders????? Only in Hillary Land.
Gee I hope ( Guns ) they don't see me ( Guns ) talking about ( Guns ) online ( Guns ).
Ok now what?
But...but...but, according to our resident (short term, non green) obama bumkisser, the State Dept, is responsible. Hmmm, the State Dept issues Executive Orders????? Only in Hillary Land.
It's not an EO. Even the NRA doesn't claim this is Obama himself, but describe the driving force as "the Obama State Department", making changes to " the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which implement the federal Arms Export Control Act (AECA). ".I do, but there are laws against that as well. It's not a bill, it's an executive order, the only way to fight it is to deal with the executive branch or to challenge it in court.
Federal Register FR-2015-06-03/pdf/2015-12844 said:5. Revised Definition of Public Domain The Department proposes to revise the definition of ‘‘public domain’’ in ITAR § 120.11 in order to simplify, update, and introduce greater versatility into the definition. The existing version of ITAR § 120.11 relies on an enumerated list of circumstances through which ‘‘public domain’’ information might be published. The Department believes that this definition is unnecessarily limiting in scope and insufficiently flexible with respect to the continually evolving array of media, whether physical or electronic, through which information may be disseminated. The proposed definition is intended to identify the characteristics that are common to all of the enumerated forms of publication identified in the current rule...
The proposed definition requires that information be made available to the public without restrictions on its further dissemination. Any information that meets this definition is ‘‘public domain.’’ The definition also retains an exemplary list of information that has been made available to the public without restriction and would be considered ‘‘public domain.’’ These include magazines, periodicals and other publications available as subscriptions, publications contained in libraries, information made available at a public conference, meeting, seminar, trade show, or exhibition, and information posted on public Web sites.
. . .
A note is added to clarify that a person will be deemed to have knowledge of U.S.-origin ‘‘technical data’’ if the person previously participated in the ‘‘development’’ of a ‘‘defense article’’ described in the same USML paragraph, or accessed (physically or electronically) that ‘‘technical data.’
For anybody wondering what this is about, see [thread=283809]Dupe1[/thread] Dupe2, [thread=283800]Dupe3[/thread] and [thread=283788]Dupe4[/thread].
It's not an EO. Even the NRA doesn't claim this is Obama himself, but describe the driving force as "the Obama State Department", making changes to " the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which implement the federal Arms Export Control Act (AECA). ".
So this is rulemaking which falls under the authority of the state department, as authorized by the AECA of 1976; not an EO, but a law, passed by congress and signed by Gerald R. Ford on June 30, 1976. It's a bit late to impeach him.
If you actually read the information published in the Federal Register, this is a "clarification" of the ancient ITAR regulations, and a bunch of bloggers (and the NRA) are taking the worst possible misreading of the change to generate clickbait posts claiming the sky is falling.
You conveniently forget that I referred to this as bogus. I was disputing that the "State Department" issues EOs, as you claimed. "Executive Orders (EOs) are legally binding orders given by the President, acting as the head of the Executive Branch, to Federal Administrative Agencies. Executive Orders are generally used to direct federal agencies and officials in their execution of congressionally established laws or policies."Thank you for explaining it better without fearmongering, I'm being called an Obama-bot for doing the same thing here.
Thank you for explaining it better without fearmongering, I'm being called an Obama-bot for doing the same thing here.
Gee I hope ( Guns ) they don't see me ( Guns ) talking about ( Guns ) online ( Guns ).
Ok now what?