DitchDigger
NES Member
Thank you for the heads up on this.
Emails sent
Emails sent
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Positive rep inbound to the OP for posting the link and pointing out the email automation.
I did not use it as yesterday I sent personal emails to Sen Jen Flanagan and Rep Jon Zlotnik, and I will follow up with a phone call next week. I am also going to send written letters of support to the authors Senators Humason and Gobi.
P.S.> My wife contacted Jen Flanagan's office last week about the anti-gun bill SD.1884, Flanagan's office said in no uncertain terms that they will not support the bill.
So suck on that while you crawl back into your Newton wack-a-mole hole Sen. Creem.
nope, most of the dems in MA just ignore them, and the rest just mark off a book with tick marks that say pro and con on them. Then they robo reply back to you.Does anyone know from experience whether reps/senators treat these robo-letters any differently than if it were to be personalized from a constituent?
Yup both Khan and Baisler are yenta pieces of shit.I live in Newton, both of the state legislators here would like to forcefully seize all firearms from citizens, and probably put them in jail for good measure.
I got this reply from my representative, Paul Heroux:
"Thanks for your email. I got dozens of emails on this issue. My position on guns is that I do not interfere with the 2ND. The problem with this bill is that is it unlikely to ever come up for a vote. It is best to contact the chair of the House and Senate judiciary committees and the House Speaker and Senate President and urge them to put this up for a vote.
You can also read what I have written about guns here - http://www.paulforattleboro.com/crime-policy.html"
Getting Deleo and Rosenberg on board with the legislation will be a key component for success.
GOAL's email and phone your Rep campaign really does seem to have some legs and that is very cool.
However, it is this key component of the bills being allowed to come to a vote that I am waiting to hear a plan for.
How are we going to cajole, embarrass, or strong-arm Rosenberg into allowing it to come to the floor after seeing his total disregard for the Bruce Tarr bill last year?
We need some sort of campaign that targets the leadership painting them as oppressive, or colluding with the AG against due process, if they do not allow these bills to come to the floor. I do not know what that looks like, but I am all in if a plan is hatched.