Just because you can doesn't mean you should.
I've been saying that for years.
However, I want the one on the LEFT side that ejects to the Left.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Just because you can doesn't mean you should.
However, I want the one on the LEFT side that ejects to the Left.
Just because you can doesn't mean you should.
By the way, how exactly do you conceal something the approximate width and weight of a brick?
This is getting stupid. First off, this will be double banned in MA. Second, I'd like to know if this is going to follow the same path as the "shaving razors wars" where each company does 2, then 3, then 4 razors. then Gillette dropped the "5 razor" bomb. Can you imagine a quad stack 1911?! By the way, how exactly do you conceal something the approximate width and weight of a brick?
Yes, because sticking two guns together will revolutionize the weapons industry.
A kid made a Remington 1740 in his garage. Nothing special about putting two guns side by side.
I think you will find guns with barrels side by side since before WWI. You can even find double barrelled black powder pistols (with two triggers), which would be exactly the same.
So nothing new here.
I'm thinking a dual cylinder revolver with a single barrel would be awesome
fan-no-more said:Although a good friend of mine was confronted by a bear one time all he had was a 9mm Glock and was a little worried that if he had to shoot would that 9mm be enough to stop the bear; I've thought about that many times myself. With this gun two .45 slugs hitting at once; I believe would take a bear down, even a grizzly.
...I see no use, except to be the center of attention at the gun club.
Not sure how I feel about this