Who asked you and why should i care what you have no sympathy for?
You asked when you posted on a public forum. If you didn't care then there would have been no reason for you to write a response.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS March Giveaway ***Taurus G3c***
Who asked you and why should i care what you have no sympathy for?
I got to check this forum out more often, I just found this thread and I had no idea any of this was going on.
No big problems for me getting my LTC from the Rehoboth PD. I think it took all and all about 50-60 days from interview to getting the card. Then again I don't have a criminal record. From what my neighbors tell me Trompetta has never been the type to cut anyone any slack.
But don't feel bad that you only got $3500. Our town is pretty much broke and even that small amount will hurt us. We might have to pay in used office furniture.
From what my neighbors tell me Trompetta has never been the type to cut anyone any slack.
But don't feel bad that you only got $3500. Our town is pretty much broke and even that small amount will hurt us.
But don't feel bad that you only got $3500. Our town is pretty much broke and even that small amount will hurt us. We might have to pay in used office furniture.
Who asked you and why should i care what you have no sympathy for?
If the speed limit is 40, is it OK if I drive 50-60 through your town? It's really not that much faster.I think it took all and all about 50-60 days from interview to getting the card
But don't feel bad that you only got $3500. Our town is pretty much broke and even that small amount will hurt us. We might have to pay in used office furniture.
Geez all I said was that the lessor fine will actually hurt us and I get a bunch of *******s and trolls expressing glee about it, making like this was my personal fault. When I first read about this issue I was inclined to support it but now as far as i'm concerned you're all just a bunch of money grubbing shysters who are as bad for this country as any tyrant cop.
Geez all I said was that the lessor fine will actually hurt us and I get a bunch of *******s and trolls expressing glee about it, making like this was my personal fault. When I first read about this issue I was inclined to support it but now as far as i'm concerned you're all just a bunch of money grubbing shysters who are as bad for this country as any tyrant cop.
Geez all I said was that the lessor fine will actually hurt us and I get a bunch of *******s and trolls expressing glee about it, making like this was my personal fault. When I first read about this issue I was inclined to support it but now as far as i'm concerned you're all just a bunch of money grubbing shysters who are as bad for this country as any tyrant cop.
I am confused Dave...you post on a firearm forum that it's OK for the powers that be to:
Not do their job
Not follow the law
Deny citizens their constitutional rights
Did you expect an understanding response from forum members? I believe you are missing the big picture here.
I never said any of that.
What I did say was I hadn't heard about the problem, that the reduced fine will still hurt our brokeass town, that it didn't take me nearly that long to get my LTC and that the chief has a long history of being a dick. Nowhere did I say that I condoned any of it. As for the 50-60 day wait for my LTC, that was just after Sandy Hook when around the state that was about the fastest that anyone was getting them back. I'm not happy about the extra couple of weeks but neither am I going to get too upset about it, not when in towns at the time were rejecting all applications outright.
Maybe you Comm2A people ought to stop being so eager to alienate folks who didn't mean you any harm in the first place.
I never said any of that.
What I did say was I hadn't heard about the problem, that the reduced fine will still hurt our brokeass town, that it didn't take me nearly that long to get my LTC and that the chief has a long history of being a dick. Nowhere did I say that I condoned any of it. As for the 50-60 day wait for my LTC, that was just after Sandy Hook when around the state that was about the fastest that anyone was getting them back. I'm not happy about the extra couple of weeks but neither am I going to get too upset about it, not when in towns at the time were rejecting all applications outright.
Maybe you Comm2A people ought to stop being so eager to alienate folks who didn't mean you any harm in the first place.
What you did say was: When I first read about this issue I was inclined to support it but now as far as i'm concerned you're all just a bunch of money grubbing shysters who are as bad for this country as any tyrant cop.
So you no longer support what? Plus you insinuated that I am a money grubbing shyster who is bad for this country...why is that?
For the court, the answer to this question started with a look at the legal structures surrounding car stops. Any time law enforcement pulls over a motor vehicle they are conducting a seizure as considered by the Federal and State Constitutions. As a result, the court will suppress any evidence seized unless the Commonwealth can establish the officers were justified in their actions.
In Rodriguez, the court ruled that police could not stop cars just because of the smell of burnt marijuana alone. Interestingly, when they did this they also reviewed an old case, Commonwealth v. Garden that had previously declared the odor of burnt marijuana provided probable cause that marijuana would be nearby. This case had been used for years to justify motor vehicle stops and searches and in Rodriguez the court chose to reconsider this position. The justices went on to observe that there were a number of ways a person could smell like marijuana, including having been in in a place where the substance was being consumed.
Martin Healy, chief legal counsel for the Massachusetts Bar Association, said the SJC decision showed that the courts are moving toward protecting the rights of citizens to possess marijuana without any unnecessary police interference or action against them. He called it an evolving area for law.
Well whatever. It seems that anything I say is just going to be twisted and ridiculed anyways so I will take my leave.
Actually Dave.... this is what you said. and to top it off the comment you responded to was not even directed at you... LOL.Who asked you and why should i care what you have no sympathy for?