Yes.
Qualifications:
1) This thread was not about open vs. concealed carry; it was about carrying by a person in the absence of, or beyond the restrictions on, his LTC.
2) That issue implicates G. L. (2006 ed.) ch. 269, sec. 10, which, among other things, criminalizes the carrrying of a "firearrm" (handgun) without a LTC, and which contains an exception for "carrying" "in or on" one's "residence."
3) That issue, in turn, raises the issue of the boundaries of one's "residence." Interpreting a similar (but not identical) exception in the pre-Ch. 358 version of section 10, I believe the SJC defined the boundary to be as previously stated, to wit: property line in the case of a single family residence and apartment walls in the case of a tenement.
4) Your question uses the verb "can," which could refer to one's legal rights and duties or could refer to collateral implications of doing something not explicitly precluded by statute.
5) Massachusetts statutes do not distinguish between concealed carrying and open carrying. Either without a sufficient license is a crime; neither with a sufficient license is a crime. However, at least anecdotally, some issuing authorities believe that openly carrrying is a talisman of lack of "suitability," which can lead to license revocation. I frankly don't think that would stand up under SJC review, but that is just one man's prediction.
6) Lots of questions can be answered with a simple "Yes" or "No," but most of the time (at least in the legal world), such answers will be incomplete and, therefore, misleading.