Being new to this forum, I am quite suprised and horrified, frankly, at some of the problems people have with acquiring a LTC-A ALP. Why is there such a problem and discrepency with some of the PD's licensing guidelines?
I was first licensed in 1991 (on my 18th birthday). I let me license lapse after 1998. When I went to get my new license, I walked into the local PD with the LTC-A application filled out and check in hand. The officer at the desk informed me that since the license lapsed and the laws had changed, I had to take the gun safety course. I took it at Bass River, went back to the PD and gave them the application and check. I was never asked for a reason or letter of why I wanted my LTC. I put on the application "For All Lawful Purposes". I was finger printed and sent on my way. 4 weeks later, I got a call that my LTC-A ALP was in and picked it up...easy!
Under what authority can a chief "restrict" a license?
I was first licensed in 1991 (on my 18th birthday). I let me license lapse after 1998. When I went to get my new license, I walked into the local PD with the LTC-A application filled out and check in hand. The officer at the desk informed me that since the license lapsed and the laws had changed, I had to take the gun safety course. I took it at Bass River, went back to the PD and gave them the application and check. I was never asked for a reason or letter of why I wanted my LTC. I put on the application "For All Lawful Purposes". I was finger printed and sent on my way. 4 weeks later, I got a call that my LTC-A ALP was in and picked it up...easy!
Under what authority can a chief "restrict" a license?