Canadian Court Rules Gun Maker Smith & Wesson Can Be Liable for 2018 Shooting

Camhabib

NES Member
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
411
Likes
369
Location
Boston, MA
I don’t think you realize that with this case a gun manufacturer is being held liable for not making their guns harder to be used in a murder. Otherwise Sig and serial numbers having nothing at all to do with this case.
Cases are often decided by the precedent on which their ruling will have. Again, I'm not a lawyer, but having talked to a number of them about very similar situations in the auto and other industries, what I've been saying is my understanding.
 

Dadstoys

NES Member
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
20,006
Likes
22,368
Location
North Shore
Unless I'm mistaken (which as a non-lawyer I easily could be), this ruling just puts the gun industry in line with just about every other one. Which is to say, manufactures have a duty to ensure to the best of their ability that their products are used as intended. It doesn't imply liability or guilt, just allows for that liability to be determined.
1613774761881.png
 

Broc

NES Member
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
48,792
Likes
92,243
Next time someone steals a car and runs someone over, sue the manufacturer. The car didn't have smart technology.
 

Broc

NES Member
Rating - 100%
15   0   0
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
48,792
Likes
92,243
Unless I'm mistaken (which as a non-lawyer I easily could be), this ruling just puts the gun industry in line with just about every other one. Which is to say, manufactures have a duty to ensure to the best of their ability that their products are used as intended. It doesn't imply liability or guilt, just allows for that liability to be determined.
Dude, what????
 
Rating - 100%
5   0   0
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
3,501
Likes
9,273
Location
Formerly Massachusetts but now MONTANA!
Unless I'm mistaken (which as a non-lawyer I easily could be), this ruling just puts the gun industry in line with just about every other one. Which is to say, manufactures have a duty to ensure to the best of their ability that their products are used as intended. It doesn't imply liability or guilt, just allows for that liability to be determined.
You own a gun, right? Familiar with how it works? Good lord.
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
3,583
Likes
768
Location
Epping,NH
All he did was clog up the courts with a case that can't be won by the prosecution. They will hope for an out of court settlement like in every other case.
What will they do when that rational is applied to cars....bikes.....kitchen knives......
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
408
Likes
329
Maybe yours were?
I just took one out of the safe to check. Here are the markings on the barrel.
The one I bought within the last few years is stamped as made in MA... So either SOME are made in Canadastan, or they shifted out of that frozen shithole.
Both of our .22 LR and our .223 have the MA markings and the Indian head logo etched onto the bolts. Might end up being collector's items one day in this world of political correctness. Check the Land O Lakes butter containers. The image of the Indian squaw is gone.
 

Attachments

  • 20210219_095246.jpg
    20210219_095246.jpg
    236.7 KB · Views: 6
Top Bottom