warwickben
bubba Kalashnikov
Friend sent me this .
I googled and couldn't find any thing . Was able to load there's site .
Not sure if it's a fake Facebook thing
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Why launch soda cans instead of drinking them? Because you can!
Sarcasm? I thought the end of the barrel was plugged?Yeah ..... I bet it's because you can easy shoot a live round out of the barrel .
Sarcasm? I thought the end of the barrel was plugged?
$400 bucks who buys this shit
I was asking myself the same question until I see they are backordered 2 weeks!
Chris
I remember asking the owner of MFL/Shooters about the legality at that shoot. In all honesty I have to agree with the ATF ruling on this one, as silly as it sounds. It IS a barrel and it does launch a projectile. I'm just happy that it doesn't need to be registered as a DD like a grenade launcher. I have plenty of SBR lowers to throw one of these puppies on and they ARE a blast to shoot.
I want to try using it like a skeet launcher: Now THAT would be a blast!
don't agree with the ATF. never agree with the ATF.
it's a bullshit re-classification of something. because they can.
i'm pissed about it to be honest.
When the ATF says that they should be dissolved and the GCA and NFA repealed, I'll agree with them. Until then...
don't agree with the ATF. never agree with the ATF.
it's a bullshit re-classification of something. because they can.
i'm pissed about it to be honest.
Let me rephrase that: I think that this qualifies as either an SBR or a launcher/DD.
That the ATF classified it as a "non firearm" and the re-classified it as a controlled firearm is complete bullshit. That is the very definition of an ex post facto lawr.
In all honesty I have to agree with the ATF ruling on this one, as silly as it sounds.
have to agree with the ATF
have to agree with the ATF
have to agree with the ATF
have to agree with the ATF
have to agree with the ATF
you should have said 2nd post first and not posted 1st post. either way you're still agreeing by saying that you think it should be a SBR/AOW and then go further to suggest DD?
c'mon. you play the NFA game, you should already know this is bullshit. don't go agreeing with these ****s and their dirty tactics. that's why they keep doing this--because people go "oh, okay, yeah you're right guise. i really should be seeing things your way."
the ATF should be abolished.
that said they very well may not care what you personally have to say but i know that i sure do--as well as plenty of other members on here.
you're doubling down on agreeing with them in the first place, and that's fine. however this is now an out yourself thread where people can profess their love for the ATF.
Direct link to ATF letter (PDF file).... http://s3.amazonaws.com/siteninja/s.../original/Can_Cannon_Determination_Letter.pdf
Ok... WTF happened here?
The product has been on the market for over a year, did X-Products ever submit a sample for an ATF ruling/determination back then?
Doesn't sound like they did from the dates of the current letter.
i know what happened. The ATF through some abstract technicality found a way to make even more money for the Gov.