'Refused/Angry/Republican': How 2020 text campaigns learn from voters' replies
When Brian Durst got a text message from the campaign of U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, the restaurant cook in Hawaii sent back a photo of himself wearing a 'Trump 2020' cap.
www.reuters.com
"These messages need to be sent by a human to not fall afoul of anti-spam laws which prohibit sending mass texts without an opt-in from recipients. Campaign volunteers and staffers use software to manually send out prewritten messages, which can be customized, to lists of phone numbers. "
"Campaign texters log numerous details from responses, no matter what the content. They can use them to verify names and working mobile numbers, score how voters feel about the candidate and register their first and second choices as well as the issues the voter cares most about... A training webinar for Sanders’ volunteers showed options to mark for reasons someone would not attend a rally, from whether they had moved to if they fit the category “Refused/Angry/Republican.’ "
I've been reading a lot about campaign text messages, a fair amount of disinformation from NES users (most likely unintentionally) and thought "hey, maybe we should have another thread to talk about exactly how we should be approaching talking to our political opponents". I'm not of the opinion telling your doctor anything but "no" is going to help keep you off the books, just like sending dickpicks to a warren staffer probably won't help either.
Though, nobody has answered my question, is responding to a campaign text message with a dick pick legal?