If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS February Giveaway ***Canik TP9SF Elite***
Main cop early in the video:“I’m not a lawyer and don’t know the law.”
5 minutes later: “I’m sorry but that’s the law.”
How does that work? That’s like my doctor saying he knows nothing about taking out my appendix, then 5 minutes later saying, “don’t worry - I got this.” I’m not going into that operating room!
Are Guns Registered in a National Firearms Registry
The Firearm Owners' Protection Act of 1986 (FOPA) is a United States federal law that revised many provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968. As such, FOPA makes it illegal for the national government or any state in the country to keep any sort of database or registry that ties firearms directly to their owner. The exact wording of the provision is as follows:
"No such rule or regulation prescribed [by the Attorney General] after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or disposition be established. Nothing in this section expands or restricts the Secretary's authority to inquire into the disposition of any firearm in the course of a criminal investigation."
sounds like tyranny to me also
The Firearm Owners' Protection Act of 1986 (FOPA) is a United States federal law that revised many provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968. As such, FOPA makes it illegal for the national government or any state in the country to keep any sort of database or registry that ties firearms directly to their owner. The exact wording of the provision is as follows:
How true. When Heather Locklear freaked out a few months ago, the cops raided her LA home on two separate occasions, with a search warrant to find and seize a .38 revolver that their records show she purchased in the very early 1980s..Registration = Confiscation
someone forgot to tell mAssAre Guns Registered in a National Firearms Registry
The Firearm Owners' Protection Act of 1986 (FOPA) is a United States federal law that revised many provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968. As such, FOPA makes it illegal for the national government or any state in the country to keep any sort of database or registry that ties firearms directly to their owner. The exact wording of the provision is as follows:
"No such rule or regulation prescribed [by the Attorney General] after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or disposition be established. Nothing in this section expands or restricts the Secretary's authority to inquire into the disposition of any firearm in the course of a criminal investigation."
sounds like tyranny to me also
right. cause we hear all the time how "good cops" and "the military" will never disarm the people if given the order.Must be fake , cops would never Enforce unconstitutional laws .
All things considered , that went better than it would have in MA.
It would have been a 3AM door kick followed by flash bangs.
The part where the guy all but said don't be seen with the one that you registered that "we're not asking to see" that is a felony in the Communist shit hole republic of California?Should be happy right, they aren't dragging his ass to jail...listen to those assclowns
Must be fake , cops would never Enforce unconstitutional laws .
All things considered , that went better than it would have in MA.
It would have been a 3AM door kick followed by flash bangs.
Theyd plant a red rider with a can on it too.Must be fake , cops would never Enforce unconstitutional laws .
All things considered , that went better than it would have in MA.
It would have been a 3AM door kick followed by flash bangs.
Lately several Sheriffs in WA have come out and said they will not enforce unconstitutional gun laws, just as a lot of OR sheriffs did a few years back. But do you really think that video was the line in the sand? If that officer refused to go do that, how many seconds would it take to send someone else eager to jam that poor gun owner up for everything he owned that was not CA compliant - including the one that officer plainly said he saw in their paperwork that was a felony to possess? Takes me about 2 to 2 and a half seconds to reach out and pick u pa radio microphone - and I'm old and slow, so I'm betting it would take them a second or so.
I'm not defending the situation - that's some pure California BS. But it's tough to blame it all on the officer that was trying to make it less BS'y.
The Washington AG doesn't like that the Sheriffs are honoring their oath to uphold the COTUS. Washington AG Issues Warning To Defiant SheriffsLately several Sheriffs in WA have come out and said they will not enforce unconstitutional gun laws