Hmm, nice detective work. I think your theory has a lot of merit. When I saw that shit I was like "this can't be right, this doesn't make sense" but given your explanation it makes perfect sense- basically they're hanging the government up by the ballbag for a takings lawsuit... correct me if I'm wrong here, but even if the "ban" stands, isn't there still standing for takings? Particularly given that ATF demanded destruction as opposed to the aikins accelerator thing where they want "oh as long as you don't possess the spring" which limited their takings liability to like 50 cents per stock or something. (because the owner got to keep the rest of the stock, however worthless it is... )
-Mike