If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS February Giveaway ***Canik TP9SF Elite***
How about my belt loops? or my finger? or elastic band. It just proves that the people who make laws and rules don't have a f***ing clue what they are doing. It's all on feelings.
Can we get one of those injuctions that libtards seem to always get to stop Trump in his tracks?
Guarentee there are lawsuits being filed today
Can we get one of those injuctions that libtards seem to always get to stop Trump in his tracks?
I kinda forsee that courts will rule against the DoJ and that may/may not be intentional.........it allows the executive branch to wash its hands of the subject and put it into the hands of a dem led House.......
Exactly. Another reason Kav was so important. This will go to SCOTUS and the classification will be reversed. Allows Trump to say to anti-gun idiots "well look I tried but the court is independent after all" while winking at pro-gun people.
Exactly. Another reason Kav was so important. This will go to SCOTUS and the classification will be reversed. Allows Trump to say to anti-gun idiots "well look I tried but the court is independent after all" while winking at pro-gun people.
Lol. You believe that.
More of Trump's 4D chess?Yeah, this is the same type of attitude of people who laugh at people for having faith. Very blasé. Some things have not gone our way in the past. Some things look bad for the future. Well I do still have faith. People here need to understand the nuances of politics more. Yeah most of us are on the right but it wasn't just the right who got Trump elected, it was people in the middle as well. Centrists comprise a large part of the electorate and like it or not, Trump sometimes has to appeal to them to have a shot at winning future elections. Kicking the issue to SCOTUS gives him political cover and (hopefully) gives us what we want in the end.
Yeah, this is the same type of attitude of people who laugh at people for having faith. Very blasé. Some things have not gone our way in the past. Some things look bad for the future. Well I do still have faith. People here need to understand the nuances of politics more. Yeah most of us are on the right but it wasn't just the right who got Trump elected, it was people in the middle as well. Centrists comprise a large part of the electorate and like it or not, Trump sometimes has to appeal to them to have a shot at winning future elections. Kicking the issue to SCOTUS gives him political cover and (hopefully) gives us what we want in the end.
I kinda forsee that courts will rule against the DoJ and that may/may not be intentional.........it allows the executive branch to wash its hands of the subject and put it into the hands of a dem led House.......
You and I both know and have always known that prosecuting clinton was never within his power and that "draining the swamp" would involve the swamp fighting back......and it would take a long time.
Looks like they redacted the title. Its not yet finalized or a law. Not that it would be a law anyway. Laws are passed by the legislature. Not unelected bureaucrats in unconstitutional agencies such as the ATF.
And to the guys shitting on trump, would we be better off if billary was in office? Will we be better off with whatever swamp creature the dims drag out of the woodwork for 2020? No? Then Vote for Trump in 2020. Hes not far right or a libertarian but hes also not a total neocon hack either. Second term Trump will be unencumbered Trump.
Looks like they redacted the title. Its not yet finalized or a law. Not that it would be a law anyway. Laws are passed by the legislature. Not unelected bureaucrats in unconstitutional agencies such as the ATF.
And to the guys shitting on trump, would we be better off if billary was in office? Will we be better off with whatever swamp creature the dims drag out of the woodwork for 2020? No? Then Vote for Trump in 2020. Hes not far right or a libertarian but hes also not a total neocon hack either. Second term Trump will be unencumbered Trump.
They like shopping around for friendly judges why can’t we do the same thing? I remember Trump speaking at the NRAA and saying how safe our 2A rights are. When is he going to put his efforts into the political donations he wanted? If he’s going to flush us down the toilet and offer platitudes to the NRA folks then I’m not voting in 2020.
More happy fun ball though, if they come out and say these devices are machine guns, there's an obvious takings issue, because there's no way to legally dispose of the items and get compensated for them. It would be pretty hilarious if by virtue of this action, they just created thousands of transferable machine guns, because if that bump stock is an MG, then they can't, in the same throes, rule that an AR 15 with a DIAS in it is a "separate" machine gun, etc. So the feds may have inadvertently allowed for the manufacture of thousands of new transferable machine guns....
-Mike
Lol he's certainly responsible, but I think blame needs to be shared with the NRA, who was doing the "lets just burn the bump stocks so the non issue will
die quickly" dance party... not that I particularly give a shit about bump stocks, but ATF hugely reinterpreting regulations on a whim is a bad
scene.
More happy fun ball though, if they come out and say these devices are machine guns, there's an obvious takings issue, because there's no way to legally dispose of the items and get compensated for them. It would be pretty hilarious if by virtue of this action, they just created thousands of transferable machine guns, because if that bump stock is an MG, then they can't, in the same throes, rule that an AR 15 with a DIAS in it is a "separate" machine gun, etc. So the feds may have inadvertently allowed for the manufacture of thousands of new transferable machine guns....
-Mike
The MG registry was never "Closed" .......Congress chose not to fund it.......
So, from a constitutional perspective you can only hope that the courts would deem the regulation to be unconstitutional and/or that failure to fund the registry = unconstitutional violation of a fundamental right