If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
no offense but if you think a 10 year old deserves what he got then you're a moron. Unless you also believe 10 year old girls can consent to sex. Either 10 year olds are mature enough and their brains are fully developed enough that they can fully understand, reasonably predict, and accept the consequences of their actions, or they cannot. Interested to see which you believe to be the case.Yes I am. The kid made dumb 10 year old decisions (but for the Grace of God go I) and was helped by his idiot oxygen thief “dad”. Right or wrong, the kid asked for, deserved and received return fire. So he’s 10, BFD. At this rate, it’s probably better if he gets taken out before he does real damage.
Besides, now he won’t take up as much effort to bury or cremate.
Correct.
Jokes aside, I feel bad for the homeowner who shot back. I don’t want to shoot anyone, and I’m sure this guy didn’t want to either. Add to the fact it was a 10 year old, and a paintball gun, and deserved or not this spells trouble for the guy.
Don't be surprised if there were several kids in the van,This article says there was several kids in the van wearing ski masks and shooting. The dad claims the kids were playing in the street.
Dad got off to a late start.10 year old boy with 26 year old father. Okay.
I'm gonna go with, because a child fell out theMay be why he only got off one shot. Realized it was a paintball gun after the first pull.
no offense but if you think a 10 year old deserves what he got then you're a moron. Unless you also believe 10 year old girls can consent to sex. Either 10 year olds are mature enough and their brains are fully developed enough that they can fully understand, reasonably predict, and accept the consequences of their actions, or they cannot. Interested to see which you believe to be the case.
The only person to blame here is the dad.
it's really not apples and oranges, it's just simply applying consistent logic. Either a 10 year old can grasp the weight of the consequences of their actions or they cannot. Simple really. You just want to justify thinking a 10 year old "deserves" to get shot because, I suppose, you're a hardo.Apples and oranges. Let me break it down Barney style for you.
This kid deserved the return fire. If he died from it, he deserved it.
Since it looks like he’ll live, his punishment by the justice system should be less than an adult. Because I agree he isn’t mature enough to make responsible decisions, based on age.
If he follows his dads path, he probably still won’t have the capacity to make good decisions, but oh well.
Yes the dad is the bigger idiot.
The kid deserved what he got. Including being run over.
Where’s that damn Joker meme?
So if the 10 year old jumps / crosses highway and gets flatten by a semi he does not deserve it?it's really not apples and oranges, it's just simply applying consistent logic. Either a 10 year old can grasp the weight of the consequences of their actions or they cannot. Simple really. You just want to justify thinking a 10 year old "deserves" to get shot because, I suppose, you're a hardo.
I'm not saying the homeowner was necessarily wrong for mistaking paintball fire with real gunfire (though I feel like anyone with an IQ over 45 can tell the difference and i'm 100% sure I'd not have shot a kid in the same situation). I'm simply saying a 10 year old is not capable of predicting consequences, weighing them against a actions supposed 'payoff', and make a rational decision. Pediatric brains ≠ adult brains and that's literally why we don't let people f*** kids.
deserve it? No. That's called a tragic accident. I'd feel bad for him and his family. I guess I'm not enough of a hardo twat though.So if the 10 year old jumps / crosses highway and gets flatten by a semi he does not deserve it?
Not knowing he law does not make a free from jail card.
I think we’ve got different interpretations of “deserve”.
Here’s mine: good shoot = deserved.
Perhaps, if it's a matter of semantics that we're disagreeing on then fine.I think we’ve got different interpretations of “deserve”.
Here’s mine: good shoot = deserved.
True enough, but it's the "dad" that deserves to be on the receiving end, not the son. I'll be the first to assert that much of what's wrong with the country is due to parents mollycoddling their children for decades now, but taking your 10 year old son to an event where there is a significant likelihood of him being shot at is a monumentally (terminally?) bad parental decision.I think we’ve got different interpretations of “deserve”.
Here’s mine: good shoot = deserved.
Please look for definition of "accident! If somebody does something INTENTIONALLY it's not an accident. Even if that somebody is young and stupid it's still an act.deserve it? No. That's called a tragic accident. I'd feel bad for him and his family. I guess I'm not enough of a hardo twat though.
I love the NES competitions for who can be the most miserable old f*** though.
(I was reading the opinion scant days ago that it's far from a foregone conclusionWhat the hell is going on with the world these days? I almost don't recognize it anymore.
Becoming more obvious every year that "adult" brains ≠ adult brains.Pediatric brains ≠ adult brains ...
(Believe it or not).The name of that tune is "March of the Gladiators" I believe.
What little I've read about the incident could fit the pattern ofWhat 10 years old comes up with the idea of a drive by shooting? Either the kid has some lovely friends,watched or listen to gangsta rap.
Please look for definition of "accident! If somebody does something INTENTIONALLY it's not an accident. Even if that somebody is young and stupid it's still an act.
Please read the original post before answering to something NOT RELATEDI bet he didn’t intend to shoot a kid with a paintball gun. That’s the accident.
Snarky remarks sooo mark you a winner in a most miserable f*** contest. Congrats!deserve it? No. That's called a tragic accident. I'd feel bad for him and his family. I guess I'm not enough of a hardo twat though.
I love the NES competitions for who can be the most miserable old f*** though.
Please read the original post before answering to something NOT RELATED
Stupid hurts!
I'd be curious if the van team new the house team.You make some good points, but in the part that I posted "Michael Williams, 26, told Opa-locka police his son begged him to drive by a home where young people were gathered Sunday night " and obviously it's just speculation, but if there was a group of kids there and someone yelled gun, the homeowner saw someone "doing a driveby" and reacted then realized it was a kid with a paintball gun? If you look up fast and see someone hanging out a window with a rifle aiming your(or a group of kids). Actually right after I typed that, I searched quickly and saw this, so this may be a bit more of a reason why the guy shot when he saw what was happening(bolding by me) and the kid shooting probably yelled when he started shooting although hard to tell if this driveby was the kid trying to be funny, or were there kids there that were bullying him and he's trying to get them back? Not really much as to the why
Police: Father arrested after taking son to shoot up home with paintball gun
A Miami man was arrested Sunday after authorities said he agreed to take his 10-year-old son to shoot up a home in Opa-locka with a paintball gun.www.local10.com
I'd be curious if the van team new the house team.
And the media sucks more than...well...not much is worse than them so we'll probably never know