He gave his buddy money to buy him a rifle so he could go to a riot and mix it up with the other idiots and u think he should be a Saint or a Knight??? Wow! How much did give to his bail fund? I’m sorry his knighthood..What a friggin joke! God bless my friend! Get your NES pitchfork out and fire away!
So what if he gave his buddy $ to buy a rifle? That is not what the line on the 4473 asks. It is not against the law to give someone $ to purchase a firearm. When you purchase a firearm using your credit card, you using someone else's $ to buy said firearm; ie the banking institution's $. KR's buddy was the one who bought rifle. He kept it at his residence and he let Kyle use said firearm when he was in WI.
You’re trying to move the goalposts to account for your poorly worded comment. But to your overall point: yes, “foolish” is subjective; no, it does not forfeit the right to self-defense.
Not poorly worded at all. My point, as it was with my other examples, was that I am not looking KR actions with a "foolish" or "rational" relevance. I am looking at it from constitutional prospective; him being there to exercising his 1st and 2nd amendment rights, which to me is just being an American.