• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Biden Talks About Using Hellfire Missiles Against American Gun Owners

mikeyp

NES Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
14,511
Likes
29,550
Location
Plymouth
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Keep talking Uncle Joe. He also show just how ignorant he is "you can't have a machine gun" "you can't have a tank"


1581359916497.png

Hey Joe Biden! You just tanked in the Iowa caucuses and your approval in New Hampshire is in free fall, with a couple of polls out this weekend showing you in fifth place. What are you going to do to right the ship? Oh, you’re going to talk about the Second Amendment? Yeah, that should work.


View: https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1226627073055318017?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1226627073055318017&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fbearingarms.com%2Fcam-e%2F2020%2F02%2F10%2Fbiden-hellfire-missiles-gun-owners%2F


Yeah, that should go over well in the Live Free or Die state.

The former vice president took a page from Eric “Duke Nukem” Swalwell’s campaign by threatening to use military force against American gun owners who would resist his gun control agenda at a campaign stop in New Hampshire over the weekend. It’s unclear from Biden’s rant what exactly would trigger him to call out a Hellfire missile strike on gun owners who object to his gun control plans, but it’s an idiotic argument to begin with.

Let’s just say for the sake of argument that things got super squirrelly here in the United States and we did end up in the awful situation of armed resistance to government tyranny. The United States is a lot bigger than, say Vietnam or Afghanistan, two places that have shown that the doctrine of asymmetric warfare is alive and well as a military strategy, even in a day and age of Hellfire missiles and armed drones. Tactically speaking, I don’t think Biden is correct.

Beyond the tactical misfire, however, Biden is making a huge mistake by nonchalantly threatening to bomb American towns and cities because he’s bothered by a quote from Thomas Jefferson. I would argue that by invoking the threat of military force against Americans who don’t comply with his gun control laws, Biden’s just himself a hole that he’s going to have a hard time climbing out of.

I believe that Americans are concerned about the deep divides in this nation, but Biden’s comments only serve to exacerbate them. Biden’s been talking up bipartisanship on the campaign trail, but that message of reaching out across the aisle is completely negated when he starts talking about firing Hellfire missiles at recalcitrant gun owners in Montana or the wilds of western Virginia. It didn’t work out well for Swalwell’s campaign, and it’s not going to help Biden in his bid to become president.

There are 100,000,000 American gun owners and 400,000,000 privately owned arms in this country. Biden’s not going to be able to strike us all down with Hellfire missiles, no matter how much he might want to. It’s a silly talking point, and one that dances right around the fact that we’re already seeing resistance to gun laws in places like New York, New Jersey, and California, where compliance rates for new bans on firearms and magazines are in the single digits. That’s the reality that Biden and other anti-gun politicians have to deal with, and threatening airstrikes isn’t a realistic strategy. In fact, it’s a call to tyranny.


 
There was just a comment that his approval is dropping by the day. It was corrected to say "by the minute".
Looks like he's pulling out of NH and heading south.

He will be dropping out of the race shortly and of course he will blame Trump but don't let the fact of Obama not endorsing your foolish old ass tell you something.
 
Dear god. Every time I listen to him I realize he is more stupid than I thought before. And this is their moderate candidate?

The good news is he is tanking himself. The bad news is that he will keep talking and eventually completely remove himself from consideration by the Dims, and they will have to choose among Bernie, Lizzie, and Butt-gadget.

The good news is that Trump won't even have to show up to beat any of those.
 
Would the military even comply with such an order?

The military has an oath-sworn obligation by the UCMJ to follow lawful orders from superiors in their chain of command. They do not have an obligation to NOT follow unlawful orders. That is a vague but important distinction. If an individual decides that an order is unlawful, then by the UCMJ they can choose whether or not to obey it, and then be subject to the consequences. Consequences could be nothing, depending on their chain of command, or Courts Martial, loss of benefits, and possible incarceration. So to answer your question, it's up to the individual. The first guy in the chain of command who disobeys the order from the top would certainly be removed. Then it's up to the next tier whether to comply or not, and on down the line.
 
Not that it matters much, but the authors of the article didn't read the tweet...

The tweet wasn't about using F-15s and hellfire missiles on US citizens, it was saying that US citizens would need F-15s and hellfire missiles to stand up to the Government e.g. AK-47's wouldn't be enough.

Either way, a bad statement.

One way, it reads - Disarm, or your Government will use overwhelming force against you.
The other way, it reads - Disarm as you don't stand a chance against your government.

Both statements imply that you are subservient to the will of the Government, not the other way around.
 
Last edited:

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Psl7ZVwiRl4


The military has an oath-sworn obligation by the UCMJ to follow lawful orders from superiors in their chain of command. They do not have an obligation to NOT follow unlawful orders. That is a vague but important distinction. If an individual decides that an order is unlawful, then by the UCMJ they can choose whether or not to obey it, and then be subject to the consequences. Consequences could be nothing, depending on their chain of command, or Courts Martial, loss of benefits, and possible incarceration. So to answer your question, it's up to the individual. The first guy in the chain of command who disobeys the order from the top would certainly be removed. Then it's up to the next tier whether to comply or not, and on down the line.
 
Not that it matters much, but the authors of the article didn't read the tweet...

The tweet wasn't about using F-15s and hellfire missiles on US citizens, it was saying that US citizens would need F-15s and hellfire missiles to stand up to the Government e.g. AK-47's wouldn't be enough.
If Joe wins and is going to have a yard sale on the White House lawn, I'll take an F-15, a few nuclear ALCM, and a B-52 bomber, please.
 
Hey creepy Joe....you delusional fvckwad....do the whole country a favor..........put a loaded shotgun in your mouth and pull the trigger.
 
he's lucky to draw 1100 to a rally. Trump had 1100 sleeping outside the civic center in Manchester last night. the place holds 18,000. they'll setup jumbotrons outside for the other 8000 who can't get in.
got this from a local well placed source: the Dem mayor told the Secret Service they couldn't setup jumbotrons cause they didn't have the permit. The reply was: "we do what we want, he's the President"
 
Back
Top Bottom