Biden Magazine/Rifle NFA Tax Stamp Budget

With Biden becoming president in two weeks and the new Democratic control of both houses of Congress, assuming Biden's wish of adding high capacity magazines and "assault weapons" to the NFA comes to fruition, if you had a budget of, say, $2000 for tax stamps, what would you say is the ideal breakdown in rifles versus magazines, assuming $200 per stamp?

What guns? What magazines? I just come here to post sarcastic comments. When I say AR15 that means 15 gigabyte augmented reality device. When I say magazine I just read magazines that may or may not have pictures of guns in them.

Now excuse me I have to get back to my stamp collection.

Green_Stamps.jpg
 
I know what you mean but we now have a 6/3 SCOTUS (ok maybe a 5.5/3.5). And the Biden stuff isn't a state magazine limit. This would be far more extreme stuff facing an extremely confident group of conservatives.
Uhhh they have it 6/3 did you not election bro?
 
ETA: If you say "will not comply" you win the booby prize of 100% confiscation of your firearms and conscription into the antifa cannon fodder brigade.


By the way, if you're a person in good standing and participate in civil disobedience by deliberately ignoring invalid laws and just let the police walk into your house and grab all your guns then your good standing in our community is worthless and you might as well be an outlaw. Our system of government is not:

(any law passed by the government no matter how evil it is)

--- civil rights

It's the other way around. We only let it succeed by letting evil governments to secure power for themselves.
 
My super secret squirrel plan is to simply not f***ing comply.

100%

I’m honestly surprised there are any other answers here other than this.

I suppose they can tax me all they want on future purchases, but everything I already have was purchased legally and I refuse to pay any retroactive unconstitutional bullshit tax they impose.

I’ll follow the constitution, thank you.
 
100%

I’m honestly surprised there are any other answers here other than this.

I suppose they can tax me all they want on future purchases, but everything I already have was purchased legally and I refuse to pay any retroactive unconstitutional bullshit tax they impose.

I’ll follow the constitution, thank you.
There are other answers because this was explicitly a thought experiment/budgeting task and not a practical "what are your plans" post. As I have mentioned repeatedly you can replace NFA with magical tokens, house fires, whatever. People are missing the point of this post.
 
As OP said “just for fun” play along. It’s NES monopoly. A good fantasy or daydream breaks up the afternoon. BTW I don’t have any magazines except good housekeeping. I gotz clips fo’ muh bullitz

As I noted elsewhere if it makes you more comfortable you can swap NFA tax stamps with "magical tokens" or whatever.
It's a game/activity, not seeking practical advice in case this dystopia becomes reality.

The point is more
- you have 10 "tokens"
- a semi-auto rifle costs 1 token
- a high-cap mag is 1 token
- 10 round mags and ammo are free

How would you spend 10 tokens assuming you would never get to acquire more tokens? I think I'd pick four rifles, and do 2-2-1-1 magazines.
Just "for fun" curious if people would rather have one or two rifles and lots of mags or a variety of rifles with fewer mags.
Whew! Ok, lol. I have to admit I read that too quick and made some assumptions. Carry on... (as long as no one starts registering mags for real, or anything else for that matter. Enough is enough)
 
I don't own any "magazines". They're all "Clips"... [rofl2]
 
I'd use the $2k to rent a truck and move to a red state in FreeMerica, to an avowed "gun sanctuary County" and buy a house outside city limits in said county.

Oh, wait, I already did those things. Carry on...
 
Is this another one of those threads where Contards masterbate over following every little letter of the law democrats write for them?

"OH no, look at that little stamp right there,, technically I'm more compliant and a bigger cuck than you are!"
 
"Stamps require a S/N. Now what? Jack.
realistically - i do not think they will care about magazines much, but, they will try to deal with all proper rifles first, especially after what happened yesterday. plenty of countries deal with it in a very simple way - they prohibit citizens from owning anything with a rifled barrel - so nobody could shoot anything from afar.

so a logical thing would be to move in a direction of reclassifying what a weapon itself is - instead of lower/frame - move the definition of a firearm to upper/barrel, then outlaw anything with a rifled barrel in it. then, job done.
 
Does anyone read the op or subsequent posts? @daekken i think people are wound too tight to get the point of the post lol.
What some are acknowledging is that framing the discussion and forcing a 'if you had to' plan is a psyop method to get you to start on the path to acceptance.

So for those who support this type of stupidity - eat an extra large bag of HIV infected dicks and get ass cancer.
 
What some are acknowledging is that framing the discussion and forcing a 'if you had to' plan is a psyop method to get you to start on the path to acceptance.

So for those who support this type of stupidity - eat an extra large bag of HIV infected dicks and get ass cancer.
"Plan" is an interesting choice of terms since I explicitly said this was not a plan or real world advice and anyone that wanted to post could change the tax stamp structure to something else.

But good to know I can post under any "if you had to pick one gun" or "if you were in a fire and could save one rifle..." thread decrying it as a psyop since this is effectively glorified pastiche of that concept with a few added tweaks.
 
"Plan" is an interesting choice of terms since I explicitly said this was not a plan or real world advice and anyone that wanted to post could change the tax stamp structure to something else.

But good to know I can post under any "if you had to pick one gun" or "if you were in a fire and could save one rifle..." thread decrying it as a psyop since this is effectively glorified pastiche of that concept with a few added tweaks.
You tied the choice directly to a Biden gun ban - that is the problem.
Just because you didn't intend to have that outcome doesn't change that the effect is there.
However, you knew that a large portion of us would have a will not comply attitude and explicitly shamed and excluded those who would reply as such. So you either understand the effects of your thought exercise or have fallen victim to indoctrination training using these tactics (public school?)
 
"Plan" is an interesting choice of terms since I explicitly said this was not a plan or real world advice and anyone that wanted to post could change the tax stamp structure to something else.

But good to know I can post under any "if you had to pick one gun" or "if you were in a fire and could save one rifle..." thread decrying it as a psyop since this is effectively glorified pastiche of that concept with a few added tweaks.

I think the reason why it is not well accepted is because people tire of the doom porn garbage that is constantly all over other gun social media stuff on the internet.

I realize to you its a thought experiment but it's kind of like starting a thread on a prepper site that said " You are out of food, you have 3 children, which child do you kill first to
survive? Also, you only have an axe, so you have to beat them to death with it. No suffocation or anything peaceful allowed. "

[rofl]

Like I know I'm not the only person that sees some whiney c*** beta cuck type on socialmedia thats going "BIDEN IS PWERWEZEDIT SHOULD I SEELL MY GUNZ NOW BECAUSE THEY MITE GET WORTHLESS BECAUSE BAN IS COMING? HALP! WUT DO I DO I DONT WANNA GO TO JAYLE!"

I realize your post isn't quite like that... but the default reaction is similar... something like this...


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNsrK6P9QvI
 
You tied the choice directly to a Biden gun ban - that is the problem.
Just because you didn't intend to have that outcome doesn't change that the effect is there.
However, you knew that a large portion of us would have a will not comply attitude and explicitly shamed and excluded those who would reply as such. So you either understand the effects of your thought exercise or have fallen victim to indoctrination training using these tactics (public school?)
I excluded that because that's like saying, "how about a game of chess?" and you say, "sure" and then you flip the table over so that all of the pieces fall off. It's an action you can take, but it's not relevant and you didn't actually play the game. If this thread were titled, "will a gun ban happen and/or will you comply?" then the only acceptable answer from me and others is "F no, I will not comply." But we don't need a multi-page thread of everyone saying "I will not comply" over and over since that's the understood and accepted answer. It'd be like creating a thread saying, "Should I buy an AR-15?" It's pointless.

If one doesn't want to play the "do I value focusing on one platform or having multiple platforms with fewer mags" game then they don't have to. If they are interested in debating whether a ban will happen, strategies for resisting it were one come to pass, and so on, then they are welcome to create such a thread.
 
I excluded that because that's like saying, "how about a game of chess?" and you say, "sure" and then you flip the table over so that all of the pieces fall off. It's an action you can take, but it's not relevant and you didn't actually play the game.
this isn't chess tho


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DGNZnfKYnU


sorry you left yourself wide open for that one
 
I think the reason why it is not well accepted is because people tire of the doom porn garbage that is constantly all over other gun social media stuff on the internet.

I realize to you its a thought experiment but it's kind of like starting a thread on a prepper site that said " You are out of food, you have 3 children, which child do you kill first to
survive? Also, you only have an axe, so you have to beat them to death with it. No suffocation or anything peaceful allowed. "

[rofl]

Like I know I'm not the only person that sees some whiney c*** beta cuck type on socialmedia thats going "BIDEN IS PWERWEZEDIT SHOULD I SEELL MY GUNZ NOW BECAUSE THEY MITE GET WORTHLESS BECAUSE BAN IS COMING? HALP! WUT DO I DO I DONT WANNA GO TO JAYLE!"

I realize your post isn't quite like that... but the default reaction is similar... something like this...


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNsrK6P9QvI

I will grant the prepper example.
The doom stuff...I can kind of agree, but how many COVID doom threads do we have...there's some "great, another thread" but a bunch of people who post there gleefully nevertheless.
 
Back
Top Bottom