Purchasing a new barrel for the upcoming build on the zombie annihilator lower, and up to this date anything but 1:7 didn't even register on my radar. After thinking a bit, and then researching a bit....other than accuracy, why the hell would I use 1:7? The bullet is TOO stabilized, and terminal ballistics are effected seriously. Wouldn't I want a 1:9? The military uses 1:7, but they are also only shooting 77gr green tip and match quality ammo...and at 77 gr the 1:7 works....but for us mere mortals that are using 55gr for the range, or just to grab if needed....wouldn't the 1:7 prove....useless? In a defense standpoint. Sure for plinking or bench shooting it would make it a tack driver, but if you actually had to USE the rifle for more than paper punching, it would essentially be a stupid-fast 22lr with no yaw in the bullet, thus making it essentially an "in and out" hole. If I wanted a tack driver, I'd build one, but with the zombie annihilator, I want it to be a zombie annihilator....capable of extensive damage. I know I won't gain much velocity...but an 18" with a 1:9 will have MUCH better ballistics than a 16" with 1:7 correct? Someone help me out here, I'm lost in a sea of ballistic reports and articles and nobody with first hand experience.
So the question is, are my speculations based off of internet rumor really mean that 1:7 rifling isn't the be all to end all? Does it really hurt ballistics significantly? Does it over-stabilize a round that was designed to yaw and destabilize into soft tissue? Or did I just answer my own question?
So the question is, are my speculations based off of internet rumor really mean that 1:7 rifling isn't the be all to end all? Does it really hurt ballistics significantly? Does it over-stabilize a round that was designed to yaw and destabilize into soft tissue? Or did I just answer my own question?