• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Article: GIFFORDS/KELLY: BACKGROUND CHECKS NOT ENOUGH, OREGON NEEDS MORE GUN CONTROL

Just like:

Taxpayer: "How much do you need?"
Bureaucrat: "MORE!!"

Citizen: "How much gun control is needed?"
Anti: "MORE!!!"

They will not stop until we are completely and totally disarmed and private gun ownership is outlawed. And then they will go after knives!
 
Just like:

Taxpayer: "How much do you need?"
Bureaucrat: "MORE!!"

Citizen: "How much gun control is needed?"
Anti: "MORE!!!"

They will not stop until we are completely and totally disarmed and private gun ownership is outlawed. And then they will go after knives!

This is old news. Just look at Great Britain and Australia. We must remain vigilant to keep it from happening here. You know that Bloomberg and Mom's and all the other anti groups said they were going to use the Washington State "success" as their state-by-state model. Now, they are working in Oregon. Oregon gun owners needed something like NES for a call to action. Instead, this crap happens because it's an "emergency!" [puke]
 
This is pretty scary from the article:

"This would open the door to banning a boyfriend or girlfriend from possessing guns and/or ammunition in certain situations, although they do not even live in the same home."

What's next? "He looked at me funny. Take his guns away?" Maybe they're trying to scare gunowners away from the opposite sex as a ploy to reduce our numbers?
 
Gabby; God gave you a second chance; why don't you do something useful? Stop messing with law-abiding citizens and put your "celebrity" to good use. How about working to impeach the POS in the People's House?
 
Back
Top Bottom