• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Armed Citizens Thwart Active Shooters 94 Percent of the Time

Acujeff

NES Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Messages
1,242
Likes
1,375
Location
Boston
Feedback: 3 / 0 / 0
While studies show that 98 percent of mass shootings occur in “gun free” zones, a more recent study indicates how these events can be thwarted: by armed citizens.

In fact, it finds that when such Americans are present, they have a 94-percent success rate at stopping or impeding active shooters.

A report by Jacob Paulsen at ConcealedCarry.com found that in 94 percent of cases, armed citizens successfully intervene during what the bureau calls “active shooter events,” which is defined by the FBI as, “One or more individuals actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area.”

Paulsen notes that the FBI has published three reports that detail active shooter events between 2000 and 2017. The first covers event between 2000-2013; the second from 2014-2015; and the third from 2016-2017.

… He notes … that the FBI does not include domestic shooting incidents or gang-related shootings in its reports.

Also, “For the FBI to define an incident as an Active Shooter incident both law enforcement personnel and citizens have to have the potential to affect the outcome of the event based upon their responses to the situation,” he writes.

It turns out that 283 events qualify as Active Shooter incidents, and Paulsen and his colleagues found that of them, an armed citizen was present 11.7 percent of the time (in 33 cases).

A further examination of those 33 cases found ‘armed citizens were successful at stopping the active shooter 75.8 percent of the time (25 incidents) and were successful in reducing the loss of life in an additional 18.2 percent (6) of incidents.’ Translated, ‘armed citizens are successful 94 percent of the time at active shooter events.

More little-known facts:

• While often portrayed as a Wild West of murder and mayhem, the United States ranks only 83rd among the world’s nations in intentional homicide rate, according to Index Mundi.

• Countries such as Russia, Mexico, and Brazil have far stricter gun laws than the United States, but also more homicide. Furthermore, as Professor Thomas Sowell wrote in 2012, “Gun ownership has been three times as high in Switzerland as in Germany, but the Swiss have had lower murder rates. Other countries with high rates of gun ownership and low murder rates include Israel, New Zealand, and Finland.”

Full article:
Guns Save Lives — Armed Citizens Thwart Active Shooters 94 Percent of the Time
 
I don't think that New Zealand is a great example to use, as I understand that magazine capacity is limited to 7 rounds.

I have cousins in Switzerland who have some serious badass real assault weapons, although they can only have so much ammo at a time. Target shooting there is a highly valued and respected sport. Lots of guns.....virtually no crime.
 
A friend explained a gunfight with his 38 super in Papua New Guinea that saved him from highwaymen (yes, I said highwaymen). I would normally be inclined to think he was bsing me, but he did produce a PNG carry permit - which I understand he subsequently sold for tens of thousands. Carry permits in PNG are like taxi medallions in NYC - fixed number, can be bought and sold provided buyer meets requirements.
 
Does data exist to explain the rate of arrests, arrests with prosecutions, and conviction rates of citizens who use lethal force for self defense (not defending property )?

In blue states vs red states?

The report from New American is pretty cheery, but as a rightfully so jaded gun owner I wonder how many people are dragged through prosecutions and persecutorial show trials for defending themselves and their families etc. I can see mentally ill DA's and attorney generals (see Moooorah Healey) vindictively trying to ruin peoples lives.

That would make a good paper.
 
Back
Top Bottom