• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

ARGH! Very badly slanted article in Globe about GOAL

hminsky

NES Life Member
NES Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
9,162
Likes
5,682
Feedback: 82 / 0 / 0
This is an outrageous article from the front page of the Boston Globe online. It basically is smearing the Healey campaign and GOAL as being a bunch of extremist violence-loving lunatics.

The article quotes one Northeastern professor as the expert who maintains that any weakening of gun control would of course lead to more violence.

They neatly let Deval Patrick off the hook by saying he never responded to GOAL's questionaire (what a clever slime ball he is).

This demands a reasoned and intelligent set of responses to the editor. Do not send flames in, they will simply pick and choose the stupidest one with the worst grammar and print it.

This really makes me sick.

Choice quotes
``Sportsmen don't hunt game with assault rifles that spray-fire armor-piercing bullets," Birks said. ``It's that simple. I don't know how any law enforcement officer could support a candidate who, like Kerry Healey, accepts the endorsement of a gun group that doesn't recognize the need for some common-sense limits."

``Notwithstanding the recent rise in gun-related homicides locally, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts continues to have a relatively low rate of murder, thanks in part to the fact that so few residents own or carry firearms," Levin said in an e-mail.



http://www.boston.com/news/local/po.../10/17/healey_gets_gun_owners_groups_backing/

Healey gets gun owners group's backing
Scores 95% on queries seeking nod on agenda

By Frank Phillips, Globe Staff | October 17, 2006

Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey, who has touted crime fighting in her run for governor, has been endorsed by the state's top gun owners group after she scored 95 percent on a questionnaire that asks candidates if they agree with the organization's agenda to weaken state gun-control laws.


Healey, the Republican nominee for governor, refused a Globe request for her answers to the questions by the Gun Owners Action League. The group, which also refused to release her answers, said its rating shows Healey ``expressed strong support for gun rights."

The league's questionnaire asks candidates if they support or oppose creating a system for ballistic fingerprinting, easing restrictions on granting firearm licenses to those with police records, and curbing the power of local police chiefs to deny permits to carry guns.

One of the questions, asking whether any gun should be banned, relates to whether there should be a ban on assault weapons and high-powered handguns that fire rounds police say can pierce bulletproof vests worn by officers.

Healey's campaign insisted that she supports the state's current gun-control laws, including the ban on assault weapons.

``Responsible gun owners have rights and deserve legal protections under the law," said press aide Laura Nicoll. ``Massachusetts has appropriate laws in place to protect public safety without infringing on the legal rights of gun owners."

An Oct. 7 letter from Healey, posted on the league's website, focuses on the interests of sportsmen, not on crime. ``I come from a hunting and fishing family, and, as governor, I will remain committed to maintaining that tradition and protecting the interests of sportsmen," she wrote.

Some crime specialists and prosecutors say that parts of the league's agenda would undercut crime fighting.

Paul Birks -- vice president of the International Brotherhood of Police Officers which has endorsed Democrat Deval Patrick -- said his Boston-based, nationwide union respects the right of gun ownership, but said there are ``common-sense limits."

``Sportsmen don't hunt game with assault rifles that spray-fire armor-piercing bullets," Birks said. ``It's that simple. I don't know how any law enforcement officer could support a candidate who, like Kerry Healey, accepts the endorsement of a gun group that doesn't recognize the need for some common-sense limits."

A criminologist said the group's agenda would deny law enforcement the tools to battle crime and put too many dangerous guns on the street.

``She is clearly not supportive of law-and-order measures that would assist law enforcement in its crime-fighting efforts," Jack Levin, a Northeastern University professor of criminology and director of the school's Brudnick Center on Conflict and Violence, said after reviewing GOAL's questionnaire.

Earlier this month, Healey received the endorsement of the State Police Association of Massachusetts. She points to her work at the State House on toughening drunk-driving and sex-offender laws as part of her anticrime record during her four years as lieutenant governor.

Patrick did not respond to the GOAL questionnaire. Independent candidate Christy Mihos, like Healey, scored 95 percent in his answer to the group, but was passed over for the endorsement. His only mistake, which cost him five percentage points, was to express support for laws requiring licenses to carrying firearms, even if it were just for possession at home or at a place of business.

The league blames political leaders for high crime rates and said that the 1998 gun law banning assault weapons and placing other restrictions on firearms ownership have resulted in more crime.

It advocates removing many of the restrictions on gun ownership, saying the limits would deprive citizens of their constitutional rights and right of self-protection. They also lobby strongly for the interest of hunters.

Levin said that gun control, particularly relating to handguns, is a central piece in the battle against crime.

``Notwithstanding the recent rise in gun-related homicides locally, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts continues to have a relatively low rate of murder, thanks in part to the fact that so few residents own or carry firearms," Levin said in an e-mail.

Healey sided with the league when it sought to soften current restrictions on people with police records who seek gun licenses. Governor Mitt Romney and Healey filed a bill in 2005 that make it easier for applicants with police records to appeal decisions by the state Firearms License Examiners Board. Levin said the changes would open the door for ``larger numbers" of those with police records to get gun permits.

Another crime-control proposal on the questionnaire that the league opposes is ballistic fingerprinting, a system that would create a database of evidence to track firearms used in crimes.
 
Last edited:
I get so sick of hearing about horrible "assault weapons". I'd bet dollars to donuts that if I held my M4 in one hand and my post-ban M4gery in the the other, then took a picture, 99% of the whiners couldn't tell which was which. The assault weapon ban was the dumbest piece of "feel good" legislation to come down the pike. Is my firearm safer because it's missing a bayonet lug?
 
"Notwithstanding the recent rise in gun-related homicides locally, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts continues to have a relatively low rate of murder, thanks in part to the fact that so few residents own or carry firearms," Levin said in an e-mail.

I call BS! If it's so low, then why is everyone bitching that it's so high? These people need to get it right. And I can bet you that if more law abiding people had guns, then the numbers would be even lower because the BGs wouldn't know who was and who wasn't carrying.


Another crime-control proposal on the questionnaire that the league opposes is ballistic fingerprinting, a system that would create a database of evidence to track stolen firearms used in crimes.

Fixed it for them.

This serves no purpose...except to make firearms go up in price even more.
 
Damn..I read this that this morning and gritted my teeth down another 1/16th of an inch. Dont you just love that typical "Globe spin"?

That article leaned so far left I fell out of my stinking chair!
 
I get so sick of hearing about horrible "assault weapons". I'd bet dollars to donuts that if I held my M4 in one hand and my post-ban M4gery in the the other, then took a picture, 99% of the whiners couldn't tell which was which. The assault weapon ban was the dumbest piece of "feel good" legislation to come down the pike. Is my firearm safer because it's missing a bayonet lug?


Come on... no one would use the bayonet. They'd use the grenade launcher!

Utter garbage and ignorance in this state. This is why I get so pissed at Riley, Patrick and the rest of the liberal idiots. I think there are too many violent crimes, sure. And it enrages me to hear about any scum bag shooting anyone. But can't they figure out that the guns AREN'T the CAUSE of these problems? Why??? Because their liberal positions on most things ARE part of the problem! Disgusting... and when I drive down the streets in my town and see so many Patrick signs I want to puke.
 
I'll spare you the entire cut n' paste job.

http://massbackwards.blogspot.com/2006/10/john-kerry-healey.html

I don't know how any law enforcement officer could support a candidate who, like Kerry Healey, accepts the endorsement of a gun group that doesn't recognize the need for some common-sense limits."

Requiring a responsible, law-abiding husband and father of two to shell out upwards of $900 for permission to own a gun is a "common-sense limit". Now, let's ask the Patrick camp how they feel about requiring someone to show a photo ID in order to vote in an election. Why that's a gross violation of a person's constitutional rights!!!

How about a $100 state blogging license?

Or a law limiting public protests to one-a-month?

Come on, people, we're just talking "common-sense limits" here.
 
We have a Federal Law that says we can't name candidates in ads a month prior to an election. If they can stifle that freedom of speech, which was specificly meant for political action, they can tromp on any right.
 
Frank Phillips

For those of you who would like stand up for your rights please write an e-mail to [email protected] or call him (617) 367-4033 to voice your opinion of these articles. I've wrote him last night and called him today. He's sounds like a very confused scatter brained individual on the phone and from the sound of his voice might be in his late 60's.

Doesn't matter - voice your opinion directly.
 
Back
Top Bottom