Ultimately, it will be up to a court to decide on the FID and there would have to be a valid reason (209A, R.O, pending criminal charges, commitment for substance abuse, etc. that are also FEDERAL DQs).
Sort of. Yes, The court will decide after you've had your (other) guns stolen from you and your FID suspsended/revoked on a bogus unsafe storage charge (at least in the context of this case and this particular VIRULENTLY anti gun town). (And if you don't think Lowell would stoop that low, I have a nice bridge over the Merrimack for sale... dirt cheap..... )
A CLEO can arbitrarily yank a LTC for no reason at all and that is what happened to that poor guy who had his guns stolen.
A corrupt anti gun CLEO can also trump up charges against you and get your FID pulled, or blackmail you with those charges- eg, "Surrender your FID or we will criminally charge you with a safe storage violation. " I've lost track of the amount of times I've heard this offered. (In this case, with the busted open door or whatever, they could argue that it was always that way, even if it is a bogus assertion. ) Regardless, the CLEO will make you waste lots of time and money in court fighting it, if you don't accept his "offer".
I didn't "sucked for getting the crap license"; I got what I exactly what I needed for hunting and target shooting. I have a Class D driver's license with a motorcycle endorsement. I do not drive for a living, so I have no use for a Class A or B C.D.L. with all of the endorsements that professional truckers and bus drivers need. Why would having a lesser license be a handicap if my lifestyle doesn't require it?
If it suits you, then fine, do what you want... but don't go around advocating others to intentionally cripple their license as some kind of a panacea against abusive chiefs. It's not. The only way to be fully protected from this crap is to not live here. Otherwise you are under the guillotine just like everyone else, the only difference is with an FID holder the rope is slightly thicker and a little harder to cut, in exchange for only being able to own a limited subclass of rifles and shotguns.
It might help on an out of the blue revocation- "I saw joe blow picking his nose and I want to revoke his license because I don't like nose pickers" or "One of my guys gave joe blow a speeding ticket the other night, and I don't like him speeding in my town, and I revoke the LTCs of speeders" .... The thing is, in this particular case (a gun theft report) if the cops are rummaging around in your house, all that stuff goes right out the window, as they can get away with inventing something to charge you with. A gun theft is a primary example of where they can easily get away with charging someone with unsafe storage until proven otherwise, and that will kill an FID, too. at least until you clear the courts, assuming you can afford the fight to do so.
Remember, the corrupt CLEOs are NEVER held accountable for false charges, especially not in this state, and especially not when the issue regards guns. This is a state, where in many locales, a lawful gun owner who has a gun stolen from them is not treated as a victim, but rather is almost treated as an accomplice to the crime!
Of course, maybe you live in a place where the CLEO isn't a dick. I don't know. Of course, if that's the case, you could have just gotten an LTC, too.
Also bear in mind that "unsafe storage" charges are basically almost considered a form of sporting event among anti gun PDs. It's "their favorite thing" because it puts the
accused in a downward position in court, especially when a gun is missing. After all, how do you think case law gets established based on things like handguns locked in
gloveboxes or whether or not a handgun locked in a cooler is "secure enough". It's because the PD is intentionally bringing lots of bogus safe storage charges to begin with.
-Mike