Mesatchornug
NES Member
So, theoretically, one can own a firearm and posses it under the mythical "Permit to Purchase."
But they would still need a separate permit to posses ammunition/components, no? Doesn't that mean that you still can't actually have (use of) a firearm in your home for defense without a permit?
Doesn't the defense of the may issue nature of our licensing system hinge on the idea that you don't strictly have to have a license to have a firearm?
Disregarding the tiny, little (insignificant-really) detail where there's (in my understanding) never been one issued, am I missing something here, or is this just business as usual?
But they would still need a separate permit to posses ammunition/components, no? Doesn't that mean that you still can't actually have (use of) a firearm in your home for defense without a permit?
Doesn't the defense of the may issue nature of our licensing system hinge on the idea that you don't strictly have to have a license to have a firearm?
Disregarding the tiny, little (insignificant-really) detail where there's (in my understanding) never been one issued, am I missing something here, or is this just business as usual?