I think it is likely that your typical 3-gun competitor runs his rifle harder and fires more rounds than 99% of gun owners.
True story, but it's not a SHTF rifle, Can We agree on that? Not really a general purpose rifle, but ok.
Last edited:
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
I think it is likely that your typical 3-gun competitor runs his rifle harder and fires more rounds than 99% of gun owners.
For the price of the SCAR you get have an LRP-07. Just a comparison...
True story, but it's not a SHTF rifle, Can We agree on that? Not really a general purpose rifle, but ok.
I subbed to this thread to learn about .308 rifles, not SHTF, battle rifles, or love affairs with a SCAR. So much derp.
For the price of the SCAR you get have an LRP-07. Just a comparison...
this might be true but the JP rifles come with the warning of not using surplus military ammo. They say themselves that the sealant used with military surplus will gink up the chamber causing jams... is this a problem with the scar? ohh the joy.
It sure does. Try running one with the gas valve improperly adjusted. If you have too little gas going to the piston, it will short stroke and won't fully eject the spent brass. The bolt carrier will then jam the spent casing between the bolt carrier and the dust shield. You can't take off the dust shield because to do that, you have to open the hinge. And you can't do that because the bolt isn't closed. Hope your gunsmith is close. If you have too much gas going to the piston, then the extractor can rip the base off the cartridge case. Have fun getting that out of the chamber.i wonder if the FAL has a " de-bugging" procedure?
It sure does. Try running one with the gas valve improperly adjusted. If you have too little gas going to the piston, it will short stroke and won't fully eject the spent brass. The bolt carrier will then jam the spent casing between the bolt carrier and the dust shield. You can't take off the dust shield because to do that, you have to open the hinge. And you can't do that because the bolt isn't closed. Hope your gunsmith is close. If you have too much gas going to the piston, then the extractor can rip the base off the cartridge case. Have fun getting that out of the chamber.
I don't trust any gun for defensive uses unless I've run it hard. Even good manufacturers build turds now and then.
So in .308 from 200m-700m which direction do you go for $2k:
-Bolt gun (700 or RPR)?
-Semi auto (AR10)?
So LaRue it is
Looks like I'm not getting an FAL for sure. One more reason to go Scar. The FAL was one of the most prolific rifles in history, I cant imagine it's as finicky as u make I sound. If poor starving black kids can operate one, I'm not gonna even imagine it's a problem.
Just to add I hear a lot of talk about accuracy from some folks and then they pump the cheapest ammo they can muster through the rifle and cry foul on the rifle? There has to be a line drawn between a "battle" rifle and a "target" gun. I'm sure most would agree they will take a sub 4" moa battle axe with high reliability with any any ammo vs a sub moa rifle that may puke on NATO ammo. The reason why the AK is so darn popular. It's inexpensive to make , and goes chatty clack with boring repeatability. Accurate....ahh maybe not. Your choices are limited to the ammo you decide to dump through it. If you can get 1moa with 308 nato with your rifle it's time to hit the nationals and sweep up the trophies.
I subbed to this thread to learn about .308 rifles....
I've pretty much decided that I'm going to get a SCAR. For all the purposes outlined here in this thread. I'm not going to jump at the crazy prices right now though. I do like the promotion going on with FNH with the free trigger it comes with but some of the SCARS on the shelfs that can be found don't qualify.... maybe because they've been sitting for so long or something and the serial numbers don't match? Who knows...
A few months ago SCARS were going for $2500 for the black and FDE for like $2650. Now they are about $3K and $3500 which is a little rich for me right now.
I'm going to let the dust settle and see what happens next spring unless I find one somewhere for the real cost of what it was worth. For whatever reason FNH isn't manufacturing a lot right now. So supply is limited hence the high price.
It seems to be a very well rounded rifle... fun at the range in short distances; fun at the range a long distances (200m) and looks super killy.
Imagine what it would look like if you had your tactical uggs on too? Tom Brady would be proud I'm sure....
When you get it you can do a nice range report and tell us how yours does.
My AR is loud already due to the compensator, 7.62 must really boom with a comp on it?
Heat it up real nice with some mag dumps until those groups start really blossoming.
rofl Merry Christmas.
On that note, I said "MC" to a girl I work with today and she replied "how do you know I celebrate Christmas?"
My reply: "It wasn't a question."
In a bad situation, I would take a 3-gun rifle that has been well rung out over a rifle that has had a couple hundred rounds run through it and has sat in the safe for the last 10 years. The 3-gun rifle has been debugged -- its problems, if any, have already been found and fixed.
So in .308 from 200m-700m which direction do you go for $2k:
-Bolt gun (700 or RPR)?
-Semi auto (AR10)?
The FAL was one of the most prolific rifles in history, I cant imagine it's as finicky as u make I sound. If poor starving black kids can operate one, I'm not gonna even imagine it's a problem.
I've run the very same surplus ammo through my M1a and my FAL. The M1a was significantly more accurate. Some of that accuracy is no doubt due to the fact that the M1a has a good trigger and excellent sights, while the FAL has a crap trigger and fair sights.