Got it!
I should start a new thread for each yearly event that should be recognized to keep you whiners from complaining.
Nah, I don't really mind; it's nice to see these old names again.
Just something I noticed, is all.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Got it!
I should start a new thread for each yearly event that should be recognized to keep you whiners from complaining.
I listened to it when the podcast first came out and don't recall many of those details.Can you give the quick summary? Does Mireles admit how badly they all screwed up?
No worries. It's all good!Nah, I don't really mind; it's nice to see these old names again.
Just something I noticed, is all.
Paul Harrel does a good video on it
Also: running around without your gun because it flew off the seat is not a sound tactical approach.I was in a Rangemaster class where before a string of fire Tom Givens would tell the class, "This is how far Special Agent Grogan was when he fired at..." and then before another string, "This is how far Special Agent McNeil was when he fired at..." and again before another, "This is how far away Special Agent Orrantia was when he fired at..."
I remember thinking that those distances weren't really that far and the effect that extreme stress has on human performance.
Haven't heard that one before. Where are those details?And maybe don't have coworkers who are out banging women when they are supposed to be working as your backup?
IIRC, the decision to ram was made to keep the suspects from firing at an FBI car that was approaching from the opposite direction and to keep the suspects on the back road instead of getting back to the heavy traffic on the Dixieland Highway.Maybe noted above, but one takeaway by the FBI was that it would not in the future seek to engage in close quarter shootouts around vehicles and would would not engage in the tactic of using chase cars to ram/force a target vehicle off the road. It concluded that close quarter combat around vehicles was way to unpredictable. Better to maintain distance in any ensuing shoot out.
Maybe true, maybe not?I thought one of the agents was with a waitress when the chase started and he had been known to be banging her.
And maybe don't have coworkers who are out banging women when they are supposed to be working as your backup?
That was an element in John Ross's novel "Unintended Consequences", but he mixed truth and artistic license with several based-on-true-cases incidents.I thought one of the agents was with a waitress when the chase started and he had been known to be banging her.
In his novelized version, two agents were tag-teaming a waitress.
That was an element in John Ross's novel "Unintended Consequences", but he mixed truth and artistic license with several based-on-true-cases incidents.
In his novelized version, two agents were tag-teaming a waitress.
Not sure if it's been posted here before or not, first time I've seen it.
Makes me want to re-think my using a PF-9 as a daily carry. Either that or it solidifies my thought that 7+1 rounds of 9mm is only to be used to get me the f*ck out of the situation and nothing more. I might just go back to carrying 26 rounds of 10mm
What's the point thenAnd maybe don't have coworkers who are out banging women when they are supposed to be working as your backup?