headednorth
NES Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 26,420
- Likes
- 48,706
So underrated. Can't tell you how many times I mention that series to people and they've never heard of it"Bey, we shot a narco."
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS February Giveaway ***Canik TP9SF Elite***
So underrated. Can't tell you how many times I mention that series to people and they've never heard of it"Bey, we shot a narco."
Wisconsin law is actually in Rittenhouse's favor in this case. There's an out on the "during the commission of a felony" aspect if the person tries to disengage from the situation. As Rittenhouse is shown on video being chased by all three of the people shot prior to each of the shootings, the disengagement aspect should break his way.State law will play a major factor. In some states, if you kill a person while commiting a crime, it's a murder charge straightaway. If the rifle was illegally purchased and possessed, that could be at least part of the reasons for murder charges. Each state is different. If this incident happened in Texas, the defense team would have a much easier time than the prosecutors.
Sure, sure.That doesn’t square with the actual text of the law, though.
That doesn’t square with the actual text of the law, though. Abramski v US further supports my point that purchasing a firearm on behalf of another person, for any reason, constitutes a “straw purchase”.
Kyle Rittenhouse says he used coronavirus stimulus check to buy AR-15 used in fatal shooting
"No, I don't regret it," Rittenhouse told The Washington Post about buying the gun. "I feel like I had to protect myself."www.nbcnews.com
If the law is followed, he is toast.I wonder if he realizes he just admitted soliciting a straw purchase and will likely face Federal charges as a result?
2020 is a real "out yourself" year, eh?My Pillow guy has more balls than the tactical coffee people.