If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Markup has meaning. When you click through to the bill text, suitable appears only in a strikeout:HOw can any bill that includes the clause " [and that the applicant is a suitable person to be licensed] " be called a "constitutional carry" bill?
SB12 said:Explanation: Matter added to current law appears in bold italics.
Matter removed from current law appears [[strike=in brackets and struckthrough]in brackets and struckthrough.[/strike]]
I.(a) ... shall issue a license ...if ... the applicant ...has any proper purpose, [[strike=and that the applicant is a suitable person to be licensed]and that the applicant is a suitable person to be licensed[/strike]] unless the applicant is prohibited by New Hampshire or federal statute from possessing a firearm. Hunting, target shooting, or self-defense shall be considered a proper purpose. The license shall be valid for all allowable purposes regardless of the purpose for which it was originally issued.. . .
Is SB12 still in the Senate Judiciary commitee?
True, it could be phrased better....I really wish the bill had not included "...or federal" in the language. NH doesn't assimilate other federal gun laws into state statutes. NH issuing officials aren't necessarily subject matter experts on federal law...
Tomorrow there will be the first hearing. The Senate cmte has 5 members, 2 are co-sponsoring the bill and the 3rd republican has voted for this several times in the past. The real concern is the first hearing in the House. Save your ammo for that hearing.
LOL, yeah. It pretty much just got there.
Sorry, getting a little anxious!
Here's the docket tracker. 1st hearing is Tuesday.
http://gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_st...0&sy=2017&sortoption=&txtsessionyear=2017&q=1
I believe we now have a Pro 2A Gov correct? I am prettysure the reason why this has not passed in the past is due to a GoV Veto.
Governor Chris Sununu is on record for supporting Constitutional Carry. I think it's still on his campaign site.
And yes to your second question. Hassan was very anti-2A despite claiming she wanted to protect our gun rights.
On Tuesday, January 10, the Senate Judiciary Committee successfully voted Senate Bill 12 out of committee. SB 12, legislation eliminating the requirement to obtain a permit in order to lawfully carry, will now go to the Senate floor for consideration
Email from NRA: "New Hampshire: Critical Constitutional/Permitless Carry Legislation Passes Out of Committee!"
I really hope the NRA stays as far away as possible on this.
Hassan was very anti-2A despite claiming she wanted to protect our gun rights.
No. The context was that she was lying.
Tomorrow there will be the first hearing. The Senate cmte has 5 members, 2 are co-sponsoring the bill and the 3rd republican has voted for this several times in the past. The real concern is the first hearing in the House. Save your ammo for that hearing.
See the old [thread=246021]summary of New Hampshire gun rights organizations[/thread]. Sadly, none of the firearms-specific groups have an effective online presence outside of Facebook.man NH going to constitutional carry would be tremendous. that would be such a great thing. i really hope this gets passed. if you people know of any organizations helping to promote this bill, let me know and I will make a donation.
man NH going to constitutional carry would be tremendous. that would be such a great thing. i really hope this gets passed. if you people know of any organizations helping to promote this bill, let me know and I will make a donation.
man NH going to constitutional carry would be tremendous. that would be such a great thing. i really hope this gets passed. if you people know of any organizations helping to promote this bill, let me know and I will make a donation.
I really hope the NRA stays as far away as possible on this.