Search results

Not saying his name doesn't change anything. Ignoring history and refusing to know it has terrible results. Next we'll be calling him "he who shall not be named". It's almost as bad as those people in Austria wetting themselves because a bell in a tower still has an inscription talking about...

I bet she wets her pants starting her car every day. Just think of all the little children she might run over, or the gas station she might collide with and blow up!

From another engineer who understands what you're saying, thank you for posting this. Ignorance makes people think lots of things, and this is just one of them. Just because computers became cheap and viable doesn't meant 3d printing will be. Think about it this way, bridgeports haven't...

Ridiculous, but they will never stop the files now. I'd bet there are probably 3d models of just about any gun somewhere on the net.

Just what we need, more registries.

Exactly, they all want to "improve" or "enhance" the checks, laws, registrations, etc until our rights are completely restricted. No thanks.

This, no one here will ever be making these things unless they have a 100K+ for a machine. At that price just buy some old mill/lathe equip and make something real. This is making a point only, real prints for real guns are already out there and have been for a very very long time.

Our society would be much better right now if people could understand this.

Listening to the testimony in RI tonight, I took out my copy of the Federalist Papers. It never ceases to amaze me how intelligent the founders really were. In fact, they were able to predict what has happened up until today: Of course the environment today has changed. Now both the...

All I'm getting so far is RI police = anti rights.

Why should I thank my "representatives" for voting in favor of my rights, I simply expect them to do that in the first place, it's their job!

It's really amazing how many people here hate how our justice system is supposed to operate.

The problem with actions taken based on heightened emotions is it leads to incremental losses of liberty. Yes the root of law might lie in the emotional response or anticipated response to a crime against someone. Yet the best time to make new law is not "in the wake" of incidents, in fact...

Does the boston strong t-shirt depict someone in a bathrobe bending over while SWAT aims rifles at him?

We don't need them, along with 80% of the military infrastructure we have. Our military is sized and geared for invading and "democracy building", not mainland defense. Let's go back to doing just mainland defense, with a big bowl of popcorn to watch what happens over there. No one can touch...

You can fix it guys, keep voting! [rofl]

No militarization is needed, one or two officers with scoped bolt action rifles could have taken care of the situation easily at that range. They would just need some basic marksmanship experience. It wasn't even 100 yards if what I read was correct.

What is interesting is that the constitution never permitted slavery in the first place. The problem was people as a whole not recognizing some people as humans with equal rights. The constitution never prohibited women from voting either. And it certainly doesn't prohibit gay marriage...

Sorry, but fail. For police, if they can't safely engage a target they shouldn't be doing it at all. The only exception should be if they can't retreat. Also: if you're aiming down the street at someone, and there are bullet holes in 2nd story apartments off the side of the street, you're...

Nothing the government does should be secret.