Search results

Don't be an idiot. If someone is beating *anyone*, they should be arrested. That's what happens if any random person beats any other random person. But when that happens, the person who did the beating doesn't get to wander around free (like with a RO), they have to make bail, if that's...

Wow…. I believe that domestic violence and animal cruelty are really good indicators of future violence; and should be considered strongly when evaluating the danger someone poses is to public safety…. and I think your position on this is bonkers. If someone is a threat, arrest them. Then...

1) there is a federal law saying people with a RO can’t have guns. 2) a fifth circus court ruled that law unconstitutional under Bruen: people people with a RO against them can keep their guns. 3) US justice department wants SCOTUS to undo (2), above.

No, the justice department wants to reverse the fifth circuit decision that allows people under a restraining order to keep their guns. They want SCOTUS to reverse the reversal of the federal law.

Still yearly, but you don't have to go to Lynn Chelsea except every five six years. Renew by mail I think.

I had to provide proof of NRA training certification when I got my state cert and when renewing. I’m going with, “memory is faulty”.

So, if he's "caught" in his house with a handgun that he legally acquired, but without an LTC, that's still a problem, right?

Stupid question: Is it actually possible to see the text of the executive order, or is it some Healey style secret order that we're not allowed to see?

Huh.. I really like weird guns. Stuff that makes you say, "huh... so more than one person thought that was a good idea?" The Webley-Fosbery seems to fall into that bucket. But maybe not worth my $12k or whatever they cost now.

Webley-Fosbery Autorevolver

No, I don't think you do. I think "guy with a gun" was the guy who was dealing drugs, and the white guy tried to rob the guy with a gun, and won a stupid prize for playing the stupid game. Guy with a gun killed white guy in self defense, and was charged (and pleaded guilty to) possession of...

I wonder why they didn’t just go with “self defense”. Maybe that’s not a thing in Canada.

@MGnoob Crap. You’re right. Reading comprehension fail on my part. Sorry about that.

OK. But that doesn't make it a good idea to help. Throw sand in the gears. Make it harder. Don't be a collaborator.

Yes, that's right... for now. Would you use the same argument for gun control laws? Look at the gun laws in 1967, then in 1968. I seem to remember they didn't stop there.

For failing to have the correct ID. That's the way all this shit starts. Maybe it's not "arrest you" at first, but it might be "can't go into Federal buildings or an airplane" and then it's "can't go into sports arenas", then "can't drive", then it's "can't go on public streets" Sure...

Those are the stupidest reasons to be in favor of or not object to something. More required paperwork means more ways they can hassle you or put you in jail. "I'm already bleeding, I might as well cut myself again." "I've already got lead poisoning, I don't see the point in HEPA filters...

A national ID card required for travel (only required for travel for now) is one of the necessary steps on the path to an authoritarian/totalitarian government.

This depends greatly on your hand shape. The Glock grip shape and angle works really well for me.

In.