+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 90

Thread: A common sense approach to gun control

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    NES Member R1ch is an expert R1ch is an expert R1ch is an expert
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Where there once was a man in the mountain
    Posts
    550

    Default A common sense approach to gun control

    Hmm... I opened my local newspaper and found this under the opinions.... looks like MA is spreading north:

    http://www.derrynews.com/opinion/loc...147133745.html

    A common sense approach to gun control

    My View
    Alexandra McKinney


    "Live free or die" may be our motto, but we must take a hard line when it comes to the tragic results of allowing guns to fall into dangerous hands.

    With two recent instances of gun violence in Derry on the same day, it's time to scrutinize how our state is, or isn't, working to prevent gun violence. Both sides must rise above partisanship and embrace basic state gun control standards—universal background checks and mandatory licensing—to help New Hampshire forge reasonable compromises between the rights of responsible gun owners and common-sense measures and set a precedent for other states and the nation.

    Think about this. New Hampshire has few gun control laws beyond federal requirements. We don't ban concealed weapons, assault weapons, or large-capacity magazines. While these subjects are more controversial, both sides can compromise by requiring universal background checks and licensing.

    These regulations may have been unnecessary in the past, but as times change, our state must adapt to avoid dangerous consequences. Though New Hampshire's population growth is steadily around the national average, it's clear that more people are moving to our towns and living closer together. We must be proactive in preventing the rise in gun violence associated with population growth, rather than reacting after the fact.

    It is necessary to close a loophole in the Brady Act that leaves openings to purchase guns without background checks through gun shows and private transactions. Currently, the Brady Act only mandates background checks for purchases from authorized dealers.

    Criminals and those under 21 exploit this loophole to acquire weapons. Since the Brady Act came into existence, it has prevented 1.6 million people prohibited from buying guns from doing so, but tragedies like the Columbine shootings remind us that this restriction isn't enough. Background checks are not required in 40 percent of gun purchases. We must make sure that people who are prohibited from buying guns from federal dealers won't be able to buy them in private, unregulated New Hampshire markets either.

    We must also mandate licensing for potential owners before they purchase guns. Responsible gun owners could easily complete this process, while it deters those who want guns for criminal purposes. Licensing is effective, judging by a Johns Hopkins' study showing that states requiring licenses trace, on average, 2.5 times fewer guns used in crimes to sales made in the state. We wouldn't want to share roads with unlicensed drivers, and we wouldn't feel safe swimming or fishing in lakes alongside unlicensed boat operators. Logically, we then shouldn't be forced to share our forests, our towns—our entire state—with people who haven't been properly trained in handling deadly weapons. As an additional dissuasion to criminals, licensing allows us to keep records of weapons and owners, helping police solve crimes.

    Despite the sensibilities of these regulations, gun control is needlessly divisive in state and national politics. Most gun rights advocates resist common-sense regulations, bowing to the pressure of the NRA, since they fear such measures will lead to a comprehensive gun ban. On the contrary, these laws aren't designed to prohibit law-abiding citizens from owning guns. Instead, they work toward universal goals of keeping guns away from dangerous individuals and decreasing gun violence.

    We must, as a community, state and nation, bring Democrats and Republicans together behind legislation for universal background checks and licensing. We must make this issue a priority by holding New Hampshire politicians accountable for their lack of action this past year, supporting candidates who will back these measures, and compromising to overcome gridlock and implement this mutually beneficial legislation.

    We can hope for national action, such as the passage of Senator Lautenberg, Senator McCarthy and Senator Castle's recent bill to close the Brady Act's loophole. However, if we begin these initiatives in New Hampshire, we will reap the benefits and set an example for other states and the nation.

    By rallying grassroots support for gun control as a priority, we can urge our governor and legislators to action rather than accepting silence.

    Rather than reacting to violence after it has occurred, let's begin proactively by putting common-sense regulations on guns. What will it take to start conversations about gun control? Our reputation for Yankee tenacity and common sense should compel us to raise our voices and insist that it's possible and necessary to protect the right to bear arms and the need to live in safety, rather than wait for further incidences of violence to bring this issue to light.

    ÔÇæÔÇæÔÇæ
    Alexandra McKinney is a public policy major at Stanford University. She has lived in New Hampshire for 12 years and graduated in 2008 from Londonderry High School.

  2. #2

  3. #3

    Default

    Another highly educated fool that thinks those intent on murder and mayhem care what the laws are or what the consequences will be for their actions.
    RKBA

  4. #4

    Default

    Not old enough to own a gun. Doesn't even live in NH 9 months out of the year. Hasn't a clue about what she speaks.
    In life, if you don't risk something, you risk everything.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote" Alexandra McKinney is a public policy major at Stanford University. She has lived in New Hampshire for 12 years and graduated in 2008 from Londonderry High School."

    12 years huh, bet she's a transplanted Massh*le!!

  6. #6

    Default

    As an additional dissuasion to criminals, licensing allows us to keep records of weapons and owners, helping police solve crimes.
    she's brilliant!

    This person is not from NH. She may live in NH but she's not from NH. If she was born in NH she wouldn't be from NH.

    She ought to be tarred and feathered and rolled south to Massatwoshits where she belongs!

  7. #7
    NES Member cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Clowns->Here<-Jokers
    Posts
    10,294

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by clerk.mvgc View Post
    12 years huh, bet she's a transplanted Massh*le!!
    Doesn't need to be - she's been getting shock and drug therapy from the left at Stanford...

    Member: GOAL, NRA, HSC and proud Infidel to the Church of Climatology
    Massachusetts - 'The Spirit of Liberty' - because we killed it and now it's come back to haunt us...
    Hey Sebelius, the truth sells itself, it's lies that require a salesman...

  8. #8
    NES Member cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim Two time World Champion cekim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Clowns->Here<-Jokers
    Posts
    10,294

    Default

    My response...

    Mrs. McKinney,

    I don't ask the government to strip you of your civil rights, so I will kindly demand that you refrain from doing so.

    In addition to the history and debates leading up to the formation of our Constitution, please verse yourself in the history of gun control and its prior successful applications. If you do, you will note that the only "successful" application of gun control is accomplished by violent dictatorships and genocidal governments...

    Gun control simply does not control crime - even our own government admits this. (see the CDC's evaluation which showed no evidence of efficacy, or see the many statistics both here and in the US that show violent crimes rates increasing with implementation of gun control measures).

    Regardless - this is an enumerated right of citizenship in the United States and simply not up for debate and more than free speech, religion, etc...

    Our right to keep and bear arms serves as an important check and balance to the power of the government so that we might maintain peaceful consenting rule rather than authoritarian rule. I hope the author comes to understand this before we all have to re-learn this lesson the hard way.

    Member: GOAL, NRA, HSC and proud Infidel to the Church of Climatology
    Massachusetts - 'The Spirit of Liberty' - because we killed it and now it's come back to haunt us...
    Hey Sebelius, the truth sells itself, it's lies that require a salesman...

  9. #9

    Default

    I added a comment. This can't happen to NH too.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cekim View Post
    My response...

    Mrs. McKinney,

    I don't ask the government to strip you of your civil rights, so I will kindly demand that you refrain from doing so.

    In addition to the history and debates leading up to the formation of our Constitution, please verse yourself in the history of gun control and its prior successful applications. If you do, you will note that the only "successful" application of gun control is accomplished by violent dictatorships and genocidal governments...

    Gun control simply does not control crime - even our own government admits this. (see the CDC's evaluation which showed no evidence of efficacy, or see the many statistics both here and in the US that show violent crimes rates increasing with implementation of gun control measures).

    Regardless - this is an enumerated right of citizenship in the United States and simply not up for debate and more than free speech, religion, etc...

    Our right to keep and bear arms serves as an important check and balance to the power of the government so that we might maintain peaceful consenting rule rather than authoritarian rule. I hope the author comes to understand this before we all have to re-learn this lesson the hard way.
    I saw that - great comment and thank you for posting it.

    I find it interesting that most of the pro-gun comments I've seen after reading various anti-gun arguments in the media are very civil. They are always well thought out, informative, and they don't attack the person writing the article OR comments after the article. The comments attacking people instead of their arguments are largely anti-gun in nature.

    I'm proud to be a 2A supporter and proud to be an American!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts