Results 1 to 10 of 15
Who needs more than 7 rounds?
This is a discussion on Who needs more than 7 rounds? within the General Discussion forums, part of the General category; An excellent, well-written blog I was pointed to and thought I would share: Seven rounds | chrishernandezauthor...
-
02-23-2013, 10:30 AM #1
Who needs more than 7 rounds?
An excellent, well-written blog I was pointed to and thought I would share:Seven rounds | chrishernandezauthor
-
02-23-2013, 10:39 AM #2
Man, that guy must work in the ghetto. He sure does respond to a lot of shootings. Good article.
-
02-23-2013, 10:39 AM #3
Good read
MA Class A LTC, Member NES, BR&P, NRA and GOAL
-
02-23-2013, 10:47 AM #4
Very nice we'll said. Think I should stop carrying the 9mm and go back to the .45!
"The best thing to come out of a Democrats mouth""And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country." -JFK
-Rico 13
-
02-23-2013, 10:53 AM #5
-
02-23-2013, 10:56 AM #6
I've been spending most of the morning reading this guys stuff. He is an extremely good writer. This one shoud be required reading for every American: My life as a tyrant | chrishernandezauthor
-
02-23-2013, 11:02 AM #7
Nobody needs more than 7 rounds
All we need to do is look at the woman in GA that shot an intruder 5 times. The intruder ran away, got into his car and drive away. She fired 6 shots in total, hitting on 5 of them. Far better than most police officers do.
What is she was an average shot and only hit on one or two of those 6 shots? She and her baby would likely be dead.
What if there was a second intruder? Again, woman and baby dead.
So, I guess pols in NY and in this state believe that dead women and children are an acceptable loss to having a warm feeling that law-abiding citizens are only able to load 7 rounds into their guns, while criminals will load 30 rounds, because, yes criminals do NOT follow laws by definition.
The blood is on the pols' hands.The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing, but newspapers - Thomas Jefferson, Third President of the US
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." – Thomas Jefferson, Third President of the US
The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. - Thomas Jefferson, Third President of the US.
-
02-23-2013, 11:03 AM #8
Who needs more than 7 rounds?
Bice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
02-23-2013, 11:08 AM #9
Until a reign of terror comes down on the pols, they will continue with these ill thought out laws that do nothing to stop or slow down crime. When their children are slaughtered by REPEAT OFFENDERS that have been let out on early parole will they see that the problem is the criminal, not the tool that is used.Support Comm2A
ageres proprias tuas (in case you are to damn lazy to look it up, it's Latin for MYOFB)
A 'No' uttered from the deepest conviction is better than a 'Yes' merely uttered to please, or worse, to avoid trouble. - Mohandas Gandhi
Math always wins in the end. - calsdad
-
02-23-2013, 11:41 AM #10


Reply With Quote







