MA Gun Grab 2024: Senate bill S.2572

Remember, laws that are repugnant to the United States Constitution should be considered null and void. Further, those attempting to enact or enforce such laws should be treated as the founders did.

I contacted my rep and Senator long ago and was quite clear - I’m not following the latest ban, registration or whatever scheme gets passed so have a nice day.
 
Parker Schreiber said:
Meanwhile, earlier this week H.2361, banning all semiautomatic rifles and shotguns, was advanced out of the Public Safety and Homeland Security committee:

Bill H.2361

malegislature.gov malegislature.gov
Click to expand...

Oh Fun - time for another trip to the state house I'm sure.
This let's see if we can make an argument that does not involve the Constitution - because they don't give a whit about that or SCOTUS.
So what argument will they listen to? Hmmmm.
 
kijangus said:
Oh Fun - time for another trip to the state house I'm sure.
This let's see if we can make an argument that does not involve the Constitution - because they don't give a whit about that or SCOTUS.
So what argument will they listen to? Hmmmm.
Click to expand...
Don’t bother to dignify that bill. It won’t pass; it never does. It’s Linsky being Linsky.
 
Picton said:
Don’t bother to dignify that bill. It won’t pass; it never does. It’s Linsky being Linsky.
Click to expand...

Agreed.

It is a great reminder that they will never ever stop until all we have left is muzzleloaders and then they will want those too.
 
Last edited:
HorizontalHunter said:
And the usual list of miscreants.

View attachment 883532
Click to expand...
My Rep Armini on there as usual. The same f***ing ax wound that said "I don't care what SCOTUS says, I don't like guns" when grilled by an actual attorney at one of her Town Halls during HB4420 last summer. There aren't strong enough words to describe the local hatred for that putrid Kunt.
 
VTski4x4 said:
My Rep Armini on there as usual. The same f***ing ax wound that said "I don't care what SCOTUS says, I don't like guns" when grilled by an actual attorney at one of her Town Halls during HB4420 last summer. There aren't strong enough words to describe the local hatred for that putrid Kunt.
Click to expand...

Yet they keep getting re-elected.
 
It's a one party kingdom that feels it is not beholden to the United States Constitution. The feeling in Massachusetts by the democrats/socialists in reality

liberal communists feel they are on an island of the righteous and can do anything they want. This is what the majority of voters in the state want and they vote for it over and over again and they feel good about it and screw any of you that may feel different.
 
JDL said:
It's a one party kingdom that feels it is not beholden to the United States Constitution. The feeling in Massachusetts by the democrats/socialists in reality

liberal communists feel they are on an island of the righteous and can do anything they want. This is what the majority of voters in the state want and they vote for it over and over again and they feel good about it and screw any of you that may feel different.
Click to expand...
This is why we can't win in MA, the number just aren't there. Even if every gun owner pushed for favorable laws, they would still be vastly out numbered.
So we need to fight like we can win but in the end the best we can do is mitigate the damage.

That doesn't mean we can't take it to the Fed courts. Right now that's the only real solution to MA, the Fed Gov. You may not like the Fed taking more control, and in many states where it's not necessary that would be a bad idea, but in MA it may be a way to stop the state. A simple pre-emption clause on Fed gun laws would help, reciprocity would at least piss off MA with it's loss of control. Neither of these would have any real affect on non-oppressive states.
 
EJFudd said:
Well, time will tell... but I don't think BloomingTurd or Soros give a rat's ass about SCOTUS.
Click to expand...
They certainly did in the past but it is difficult to gauge how the cabal operates internally. For awhile they were hedging on strategic end around attacks (eg, like ubc) but after bruen their radical wing has gone full retard temper tantrum; either that or the movement feels its about to get f***ed and feels as though "full retard now or never" is in play....
 
42! said:
This is why we can't win in MA, the number just aren't there. Even if every gun owner pushed for favorable laws, they would still be vastly out numbered.
Click to expand...
Lol part of the problem is this fun assumption that every gun owner in MA is on the correct side, , is hot garbage, and that's being polite. People keep thinking that because they have a plastic card that others like them will care about rkba issues.
 
71montess said:
BECCA RAUSCH IS MY NO SHOW SENATOR, she won’t return calls about any hot ticket situation. Guns, Haitians in our town , nothing .
Click to expand...
Call her office, make an appointment to see her in person, make sure you work in that you are a constituent, only say that there are a number of upcoming bills that you'd like to discuss. When you are there make sure that is true regardless of what other issues you want to discuss.

"constituent services" is a thing for the Reps and Senators. I don't know if it's a requirement, just that they take it seriously.

And showing up in person makes a bigger impact.
 
pastera said:
Oh, I would bet she returns calls to those that agree with her
Click to expand...
I'm going to disagree on this. They get lots of call and they return a very very small number, and those will be based on more than agree or disagree. If you are only representing yourself, pro or con, you're not likely to get a call back.

Not saying its right, just that it is what it is.
 
HorizontalHunter said:
Yet they keep getting re-elected.
Click to expand...
They get back in because there aren't any decent alternatives.
Conservatives won't vote to move the pendulum a little - it's everything they personally want or burn it all down.

The left loves incrementalism and rubs our noses in it every chance they get.
 
Parker Schreiber said:
Meanwhile, earlier this week H.2361, banning all semiautomatic rifles and shotguns, was advanced out of the Public Safety and Homeland Security committee:

Bill H.2361

malegislature.gov malegislature.gov
Click to expand...
good, a semi-auto ban on the books is a hell of a lot clearer a case for the supremes than the amorphous target of "assault weapons"
at least semi-autos exist, and are arms, and are CLEARLY protected by the 2A, i say we rally behind this bill....
 
JDL said:
It's a one party kingdom that feels it is not beholden to the United States Constitution. The feeling in Massachusetts by the democrats/socialists in reality

liberal communists feel they are on an island of the righteous and can do anything they want. This is what the majority of voters in the state want and they vote for it over and over again and they feel good about it and screw any of you that may feel different.
Click to expand...
They don't care about the constitution unless it's an actual criminal degenerate having their rights violated. Then they will move heaven and earth to uphold the constitution.
 

Similar threads

Memorial Day 2024
Replies
10
Views
256
crazymjb
crazymjb
NH Gun Grab 2024?
Replies
22
Views
2K
design
design
2024 Paris Olypmics rifle shooting
Replies
3
Views
202
VTski4x4
VTski4x4
NEW- Gun Grab Bill Six-member conference committee to decide Legislature's gun control proposal
Replies
24
Views
1K
StevieP
StevieP
These Are The Worst States To Be A Gun Owner In 2024
Replies
9
Views
675
Zappa
Zappa
Back
Top Bottom